On Fri, 25 Dec 2009 07:00:22 -0800
Joshua Saddler <nightmorph@gentoo.org> wrote:

> On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:40:06 -0600
> Victor Ostorga <vostorga@gentoo.org> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > # Víctor Ostorga <vostorga@gentoo.org> (23 Dec 2009)
> > # Last bump in 2005, does not build against current
> > # stable net-nds/openldap-2.4.19-r1 bug #247956
> > # Removal in 30 days
> > net-dns/ldapdns
> > 
> 
> So what about http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/ldapdns-guide.xml -- you
> want the GDP to just remove the doc? We can do that.
> 
Yes, it will be needed to remove the doc.

> Is there a compatible drop-in replacement that will allow us to
> s/ldapdns/foo throughout the guide?

Unfortunately, I don't know an exact replacemente for ldapdns, at some
point I heard about a LDAP sdb back-end for BIND 9 [1], but don't know
if it is still functional.

[1] http://bind9-ldap.bayour.com/

Regards,

Víctor