From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NMiyJ-0003uC-Bd for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 14:10:51 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 02A4BE0893 for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 14:10:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hera.cwi.nl (hera.cwi.nl [192.16.191.8]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C0F9E079A for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 12:20:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gentoo.org (pegasus.ins.cwi.nl [192.16.196.142]) by hera.cwi.nl with ESMTP id nBLCKndc021132 for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 13:20:49 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 13:22:09 +0100 From: Fabian Groffen To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] January 2010 meeting date Message-ID: <20091221122209.GB3308@gentoo.org> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <7c612fc60912150854k608270cag61c533542075f5bf@mail.gmail.com> <200912201501.31455.vapier@gentoo.org> <20091220200412.GF840@gentoo.org> <200912202216.31432.vapier@gentoo.org> <20091221075405.GG840@gentoo.org> <4B2F5C4F.2030001@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B2F5C4F.2030001@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (SunOS 5.11, VIM - Vi IMproved 7.2) Organization: Gentoo Foundation, Inc. X-Archives-Salt: f1d50e1f-30a8-4611-a3b3-94ceed287c53 X-Archives-Hash: ebbef53b5507e6f2cb0a4528a0cd9f31 On 21-12-2009 06:30:23 -0500, Richard Freeman wrote: > On 12/21/2009 02:54 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote: > > If all mail that would go to -dev-announce would guaranteed be sent to > > -dev as well, I didn't have to check -dev-announce, and archives.g.o > > would also have the original "January 2010 meeting date" mail in the > > thread on -dev. > > Or you could just subscribe to both and add this to your procmailrc: > > :0 Wh: msgid.lock > | formail -D 8192 msgid.cache > > :0 a: > .duplicates/new Does that fix archives.g.o? No. > Cross-posting in general tends to mess up threads, but there isn't much > that can be done about that unless we just ban it. However, most > cross-posts are honest attempts to try to move list discussion to a > place where it might better belong. For commits I can imagine, but for this, it's just pointless. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level