From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NMdHS-0001nq-Fq for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 08:06:15 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1B0CCE0882 for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 08:06:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from amun.cheops.ods.org (amun.cheops.ods.org [82.95.138.191]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24141E067D for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 07:54:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tefnut.cheops.ods.org ([2001:888:1022:0:211:24ff:fe37:e46e] helo=gentoo.org) by amun.cheops.ods.org with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1NMd68-0005Mr-Ut for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 08:54:33 +0100 Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 08:54:05 +0100 From: Fabian Groffen To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] January 2010 meeting date Message-ID: <20091221075405.GG840@gentoo.org> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <7c612fc60912150854k608270cag61c533542075f5bf@mail.gmail.com> <200912201501.31455.vapier@gentoo.org> <20091220200412.GF840@gentoo.org> <200912202216.31432.vapier@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200912202216.31432.vapier@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (Darwin 8.11.0, VIM - Vi IMproved 7.2) Organization: Gentoo Foundation, Inc. X-Content-Scanned: by amun.cheops.ods.org (Exim Exiscan) using SpamAssassin and ClamAV X-Archives-Salt: 7cf5f040-da42-47cb-8573-c36cf4842229 X-Archives-Hash: 88d5c1b5bd963361951cadf645e9872c On 20-12-2009 22:16:30 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > gmane is f-ed up already irregardless of what we do. it eats cross-posted e- > mails for breakfast and doesnt tell anyone. > > as for archives.g.o, file a bug if it isnt handling threading within a list > properly. i dont really see how your proposal here would break archives.g.o > anyways. someone sends an e-mail to both dev and dev-announce, it has the > same id. people respond and they all go to dev. either way, archives.g.o > should be seeing a sane thread on dev. New devs are not announced to -dev, the mail is only sent to -dev-announce. The "January 2010 meeting date" mail was only sent to -dev-announce (and -council), not to -dev, hence replies (that have to go to -dev) are replies with the original mail missing. If all mail that would go to -dev-announce would guaranteed be sent to -dev as well, I didn't have to check -dev-announce, and archives.g.o would also have the original "January 2010 meeting date" mail in the thread on -dev. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level