From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NMOJB-0002NL-NC for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 20 Dec 2009 16:07:01 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A70F2E0893 for ; Sun, 20 Dec 2009 16:06:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from amun.cheops.ods.org (amun.cheops.ods.org [82.95.138.191]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67761E0792; Sun, 20 Dec 2009 14:49:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tefnut.cheops.ods.org ([2001:888:1022:0:211:24ff:fe37:e46e] helo=gentoo.org) by amun.cheops.ods.org with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1NMN6K-0000Wt-Ua; Sun, 20 Dec 2009 15:49:41 +0100 Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 15:49:09 +0100 From: Fabian Groffen To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] January 2010 meeting date Message-ID: <20091220144909.GB840@gentoo.org> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org References: <7c612fc60912150854k608270cag61c533542075f5bf@mail.gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7c612fc60912150854k608270cag61c533542075f5bf@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (Darwin 8.11.0, VIM - Vi IMproved 7.2) Organization: Gentoo Foundation, Inc. X-Content-Scanned: by amun.cheops.ods.org (Exim Exiscan) using SpamAssassin and ClamAV X-Archives-Salt: e7fc7870-4410-4223-947f-7d42ab74274a X-Archives-Hash: 0fd67e1f20a14db7c1edb0b95e42ad11 On 15-12-2009 09:54:36 -0700, Denis Dupeyron wrote: > I will be following up discussions on various mailing lists to prepare > the agenda. If you already want to suggest topics feel free to reply > to this thread. You'll get a second chance with the meeting reminder > approximately two weeks before the meeting. I will be sending a > message about the two topics which did not make it last time and > explain why. I should have sent that much earlier but well... you > know... I'd like to council to discuss the current *$^&!! policy of -dev-announce and -dev. I'd propose to at least implement the following behaviour such that I: - don't have to see some mails 3 (!) times and many 2 times - don't get lost where the mail is/was - get broken threading because the original mail was sent to another list Proposed behaviour: Aautomatically send all mail sent to -dev-announce to -dev. Benefits: - any reply-to hackery for -dev-announce to -dev unnecessary - being subscrived to -dev alone is enough (alternatively -dev-announce can be /dev/null-ed) - threads are complete, instead of scattered over some lists - multiple copies can be avoided - cross-list posting can be reduced to a minimum -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level