From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NLuDU-0007p6-O1 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 07:59:08 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 317E3E06E7; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 07:58:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yx0-f174.google.com (mail-yx0-f174.google.com [209.85.210.174]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 044C2E06E7 for ; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 07:58:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxe4 with SMTP id 4so3424523yxe.32 for ; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 23:58:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Qv4d1ZQFuOBeggzsZTVjVfQlybmH+BdqHYdc704GWqk=; b=adiUyz/4HEnVvx7EWW27wjUZ99AGPiDNUWA0XPk48K4tw28P+2yRp8A3+ViYnFEZ9p VxQIVQSA1SZMGp7XIOfmY1S64bVRqntxm30+WXer7bGpc2afvStZbrH3xJg6e6tUawDA fj8V+RO2BtjZ6fSaWsTib1Dq2EQCTI1VrLsuA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=J+R19ESbyE2JkN5xkBqhcYu9Q4wHgcvoZcrm1euyTR1eMNsgU04me3GmBAwc8PAOdy Uck1al+1RxtVa6QW+Cy3vSDoLY+DZtqYNUtMP2tgfudXGuA9hZeT5I6THLHg0Myfo5nC f9dgou5DsJSHYHGZ8voNqetBxndsn6yfSIkuM= Received: by 10.150.6.33 with SMTP id 33mr7881560ybf.175.1261209519300; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 23:58:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.gmail.com (c-98-210-130-131.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [98.210.130.131]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 6sm1693662yxg.30.2009.12.18.23.58.36 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 18 Dec 2009 23:58:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by smtp.gmail.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 18 Dec 2009 23:56:55 -0800 Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 23:56:55 -0800 From: Brian Harring To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: flameeyes@gmail.com, patrick@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rewritten epatch Message-ID: <20091219075655.GA9950@hrair> References: <200912181407.47924.vapier@gentoo.org> <8b4c83ad0912182336s42524ac3ka1105121bd477157@mail.gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8b4c83ad0912182336s42524ac3ka1105121bd477157@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Archives-Salt: a42d1480-fc0d-48aa-a5a3-7584310c7d83 X-Archives-Hash: 6d2ffcc659079803919f2859c39c74cf --cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 01:06:22PM +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 12:37 AM, Mike Frysinger wrot= e: > > for various reasons/limitations/bugs/whatever, i rewrote epatch. =A0see= ms to > > work for me, but in case someone wants to check before i release: >=20 > Wouldn't it be safer to let this run on, say, Patrick's or Deigo's > tinderboxes for a day or so before pushing this to eutils? >=20 > Murphy's law becomes more applicable as the affected domain of a > change increases :) Err... that's a damn fine idea actually, although it requires getting=20 them to agree to it. For changes of this sort, abusing the tinderboxes to get a real world=20 test run makes a lot of sense. Diego/Patrick- thoughts? ~harring --cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkssh0cACgkQsiLx3HvNzgdqXQCggoMWVYtYqqvhQiL2yc6wnKo5 YJcAoIZ3Y5/0+e8s3MrQ13y8RBFrsbD6 =juzV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e--