From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NL2H0-0000JF-R7 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 22:23:10 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 75408E0E21 for ; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 22:23:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mo-p05-ob.rzone.de (mo-p05-ob.rzone.de [81.169.146.182]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A20FDE0D3A for ; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 22:18:58 +0000 (UTC) X-RZG-AUTH: :K2kKYU+nW/MMMlTokcN5Yot1/Bj/FTl+WviP6RIJci0HRMpbh/x+X6ShOQvVOj49PSKrpU+J+Tg= X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo05 Received: from localhost (p5793F02A.dip.t-dialin.net [87.147.240.42]) by post.strato.de (klopstock mo13) (RZmta 22.5) with ESMTP id y073a3lBGL6mNl for ; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 23:18:57 +0100 (MET) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 23:18:51 +0100 From: Christian Faulhammer To: Gentoo Development Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] EAPI={3,4} offset-prefix semantics mandatory? Message-ID: <20091216231851.63f48736@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20091216084840.GE21795@gentoo.org> References: <20091215185944.GA9600@gentoo.org> <1260944947.29419.156.camel@tablet> <20091216084840.GE21795@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.3 (GTK+ 2.16.6; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/kPZbpXCnPG8Wuar5CncNFgD"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 3dc22506-55d9-43d3-8141-2a9dc310b8da X-Archives-Hash: 7af006023dd67f5e53cf559140f8da9b --Sig_/kPZbpXCnPG8Wuar5CncNFgD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Fabian Groffen : > On 16-12-2009 09:29:07 +0300, Peter Volkov wrote: > > =D0=92 =D0=92=D1=82=D1=80, 15/12/2009 =D0=B2 19:59 +0100, Fabian Groffe= n =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: > > > Should an ebuild using an EAPI that has offset-prefix support > > > make the use of that support mandatory or optional? > >=20 > > I think no. Without real testing that package works in prefix there > > is no need to bother and create illusion that it does. >=20 > Does your no mean mandatory or optional? As I read it: Optional. And that is also my vote here, in the end we have KEYWORDS. > I'll remove all the bits from the quiz that are (no longer) relevant, > and then post them, and their answers. I don't see much secret in the > answers, or do recruiters want to use some of the questions for future > quizzes? Post it on -core and we can decide then. V-Li --=20 Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project , #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode --Sig_/kPZbpXCnPG8Wuar5CncNFgD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkspXNAACgkQNQqtfCuFneMDrACeOdOG6F/esEeKuXS7C9jQuke1 jbYAnjw0Gtq41xliOEojl6w6AT0zhifS =Kvui -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/kPZbpXCnPG8Wuar5CncNFgD--