[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] EAPI={3,4} offset-prefix semantics mandatory?

[Christian Faulhammer <fauli@gentoo.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1023 bytes --]

Hi,

Fabian Groffen <grobian@gentoo.org>:

> On 16-12-2009 09:29:07 +0300, Peter Volkov wrote:
> > В Втр, 15/12/2009 в 19:59 +0100, Fabian Groffen пишет:
> > >   Should an ebuild using an EAPI that has offset-prefix support
> > > make the use of that support mandatory or optional?
> > 
> > I think no. Without real testing that package works in prefix there
> > is no need to bother and create illusion that it does.
> 
> Does your no mean mandatory or optional?

 As I read it: Optional.  And that is also my vote here, in the end we
have KEYWORDS.

> I'll remove all the bits from the quiz that are (no longer) relevant,
> and then post them, and their answers.  I don't see much secret in the
> answers, or do recruiters want to use some of the questions for future
> quizzes?

 Post it on -core and we can decide then.

V-Li

-- 
Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project
<URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode

<URL:http://gentoo.faulhammer.org/>

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]