From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NKSRM-0005I3-8q for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 08:07:28 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DE249E0A9A for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 08:07:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.internode.on.net (bld-mail16.adl2.internode.on.net [150.101.137.101]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FDD1E0827 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 06:46:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from passivegrunt.localnet (unverified [121.45.204.232]) by mail.internode.on.net (SurgeMail 3.8f2) with ESMTP id 10088941-1927428 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 17:16:56 +1030 (CDT) From: Daniel Black Organization: Gentoo To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] CAcert certificate distribution license to third parties (i.e. distributors like gentoo) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 17:46:05 +1100 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.4 (Linux/2.6.31-gentoo-r4; KDE/4.3.4; x86_64; ; ) References: <200912132244.09435.dragonheart@gentoo.org> <4B262C68.9030402@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart5197939.UhfTngaseR"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200912151746.09755.dragonheart@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 704182d8-c053-4671-a457-efb0b524f7cb X-Archives-Hash: ceb6cb408526c9117d220cacde7cc23b --nextPart5197939.UhfTngaseR Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tuesday 15 December 2009 07:10:25 Robin H. Johnson wrote: >=20 > This is entirely moot. The CACert materials in Gentoo come from Debian's > ca-certificates package. We do NOT independently supply them. > http://packages.debian.org/sid/ca-certificates >=20 > I think this might enable us to entirely sidestep a large part of the > discussion. quite possible. > Watch what Debian does, and see what related actions if any we > need to take. I did email the debian maintainer too. no response yet. They have interacti= ve=20 builds though and I guess we do too now. Will be a royal pain if every=20 CA/software did the same thing. --nextPart5197939.UhfTngaseR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAksnMLEACgkQhhpKunZncJe9hwCfSBRItLGY/ffW2ctCdX88ofIB /CoAn2l4+IlHqNwzLxxVWBmrAUyfStDR =pFAq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart5197939.UhfTngaseR--