Re: [gentoo-dev] irregular metdata.xml check

[Thilo Bangert <bangert@gentoo.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 851 bytes --]

Ulrich Mueller <ulm@gentoo.org> said:
> >>>>> On Mon, 7 Dec 2009, Thilo Bangert wrote:
> >
> > Welcome to this years edition of the metadata check.
> > [...]
> >
> > You will find the complete log at [1].
> 
> Hmm, eselect is not known:
> | unknown maintainer: eselect@gentoo.org
> 
> But it's in good company:
> | unknown maintainer: catalyst@gentoo.org
> | unknown maintainer: dev-portage@gentoo.org
> | unknown maintainer: genkernel@gentoo.org
> | unknown maintainer: gnap@gentoo.org
> | unknown maintainer: portage-utils@gentoo.org
> | unknown maintainer: sandbox@gentoo.org
> |
> > As usual, feedback is highly appreciated.
> 
> Could you make your script recognise Gentoo hosted projects as valid
> maintainers?

are these availabe somewhere? AFAICT we dont have them systematically 
available...

> 
> Ulrich
> 


[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]