From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NFmvk-00066R-Qx for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 10:59:33 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 12A5FE072C; Wed, 2 Dec 2009 10:59:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mo-p05-ob.rzone.de (mo-p05-ob.rzone.de [81.169.146.180]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A8B0E072C for ; Wed, 2 Dec 2009 10:59:05 +0000 (UTC) X-RZG-AUTH: :K2kKYU+nW/MMMlTokcN5Yot1/Bj/FTl+WviP6RIJci0HRMpbh/x+X6ShMA/PJTs54M/9epgz5ScKmQ== X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo05 Received: from localhost (ht-148.humtec.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.165.148]) by post.strato.de (mrclete mo17) (RZmta 22.5) with ESMTP id w0336dlB2ArTfS for ; Wed, 2 Dec 2009 11:59:03 +0100 (MET) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 11:59:02 +0100 From: Christian Faulhammer To: Gentoo Development Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: ruby-ng.eclass - new eclass for ruby-based packages Message-ID: <20091202115902.162d696f@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200912020957.40895.scarabeus@gentoo.org> References: <1259737917.26974.8.camel@localhost> <20091202095125.2e300c55@gentoo.org> <200912020957.40895.scarabeus@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.3 (GTK+ 2.16.6; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/1=8hENzUWwiHxd4+anYNylY"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 32268f15-ce0f-4096-98ce-a6be00e1f7dc X-Archives-Hash: bc827033659270777cc4b4312a2549fd --Sig_/1=8hENzUWwiHxd4+anYNylY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Tom=C3=A1=C5=A1 Chv=C3=A1tal : > > The sense of this I don't understand. You should not restrict EAPI > > like this. > >=20 > > V-Li > >=20 > Why not. Quite standart way. > 19 case ${EAPI:-0} in > 20 2) : ;; > 21 *) DEPEND=3D"EAPI-TOO-OLD" ;; > 22 esac Microsoft Windows is standard software, too....you want to use it? And if an ebuild uses EAPI 3 it will fail badly, while it isn't too old. A sane assumption is that EAPI 3 will at least contain all features from EAPI 2 with very few adjustments to existing syntax and behaviour if at all. V-Li --=20 Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project , #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode --Sig_/1=8hENzUWwiHxd4+anYNylY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAksWSHYACgkQNQqtfCuFneOmhgCgj6k5dtmVJNTJcvWtu2UYJjXC UxMAn1T5PLU2o5KH/fq0HrhBVhl7XsO9 =GybU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/1=8hENzUWwiHxd4+anYNylY--