From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NDgJi-0002CO-NI for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:31:35 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A0988E08B1; Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:31:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bw0-f215.google.com (mail-bw0-f215.google.com [209.85.218.215]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57A47E08B1 for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:31:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz7 with SMTP id 7so663782bwz.26 for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2009 07:31:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type; bh=BUK+eD3uuQL2O2wiJfZ/fDzhjGd3gFljoWZgyNDsLOo=; b=rDswn/Hd+zZjRv4eS7bAKku8TjzCaRO0OSaZekLJDxC/Z5XeYr+ZMpfWEkmv9gUWB6 1bJxZu3JdZYXCH2yMi1J3lssdxqJosZvm89bSEkRj0UlWUOsats5qDifyypk2pEFD1nu tHOPEhW3CsGBkleQqGH7+2T4h5q0oc1PzBHUE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=P6EbVHBq1jrBMKPk4x9or1Mg3Bm29+xTtevArSvi/Vw7zNlGNavBfBC8rgaqo3Pov6 Q1MmxkFoZXy2q3IpTjEcyUVYL2V2/wcHvUCc5Adg6xsN7BWuUpIVkm4ZnbTYXQqLOeHu U7h0C5kyJDtEL0+zAR3PeAuUs8hwSfKboRlzU= Received: by 10.204.10.7 with SMTP id n7mr5342380bkn.68.1259249483564; Thu, 26 Nov 2009 07:31:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from snowcone (92-235-187-79.cable.ubr18.sgyl.blueyonder.co.uk [92.235.187.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 13sm272423fxm.1.2009.11.26.07.31.22 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 26 Nov 2009 07:31:23 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:31:17 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Next council meeting on 7 Dec 2009 at 1900UTC Message-ID: <20091126153117.7c8dd725@snowcone> In-Reply-To: <20091126013438.GF23443@hrair> References: <7c612fc60911251350k3560b7d7sf4e9c867a30b0d90@mail.gmail.com> <20091126013438.GF23443@hrair> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.3 (GTK+ 2.16.6; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/3cLnPuSVDtu.KRZVPWedgbG"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 6d956592-aa8b-42e3-ae06-3783b5cfaacf X-Archives-Hash: e630a02bbe77f281093ad11b6c307bec --Sig_/3cLnPuSVDtu.KRZVPWedgbG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:34:38 -0800 Brian Harring wrote: > I'd like=20 > http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_6b3e00049a1bf35fbf7a5e66d144955= 3.xml > to be discussed, specifically zacs form of forced mtime updating of=20 > /var/db/pkg on vdb modifications I've still not had an answer to: "Provide proof that all existing and future caches that would rely upon this validation mechanism are functions purely and exclusively dependent upon the VDB content, and I shall be happy to make the change." Without that proof, all introducing that change would do is provide another unreliable mechanism, so it's of no use at all. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/3cLnPuSVDtu.KRZVPWedgbG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAksOn0gACgkQ96zL6DUtXhHqFQCfZk3n2+xlLvpbLd8G+UKL/R8r 2B0AoJLTEXYptbMgb+S/fOx6WxRq3dTb =7ynZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/3cLnPuSVDtu.KRZVPWedgbG--