From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ND1fU-0001xm-W3 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:07:21 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8D104E0814 for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:07:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E5F3E06B1 for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:01:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from angelstorm (cpe-66-75-3-21.san.res.rr.com [66.75.3.21]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95F2467456 for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:01:16 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:01:09 -0800 From: Joshua Saddler To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Bugzilla testers wanted - "Email send to: no one" issue Message-ID: <20091124110109.4dadd50f@angelstorm> In-Reply-To: References: <20091103193355.22117003@odin> <200911152209.23570.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.2 (GTK+ 2.16.6; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/RhThlbg32MxM/NLvhTA42P5"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: ee3650b5-b56e-48a8-ad43-5b716b1e754f X-Archives-Hash: 8d053fbddd6a888eb7f905db86600012 --Sig_/RhThlbg32MxM/NLvhTA42P5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 18:01:06 +0000 Jeremy Olexa wrote: > I too was seeing this at a frequency that was noticeable. In the past week > (or more), there has not been any missed emails that I have seen. Did > something get changed to fix this issue? Or are we still guessing? It does seem to be better -- I've seen at least a couple of NEW: bug messag= es. --Sig_/RhThlbg32MxM/NLvhTA42P5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAksMLXcACgkQxPWMzpKk6kN36wCeJX8DUP/hICTjOdGHw53Vxj2e 9qoAmweHW7yb4B099er6yahFQEmxfcH7 =cNAt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/RhThlbg32MxM/NLvhTA42P5--