From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-38491-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1N8GIb-0001ID-Or
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:44:01 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B1FC7E0904;
	Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:43:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp-vbr19.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr19.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.39])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62555E0908
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:43:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from epia.jer-c2.orkz.net (atwork-106.r-212.178.112.atwork.nl [212.178.112.106])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by smtp-vbr19.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nABGhvC9002527
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:43:57 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from jer@gentoo.org)
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:43:56 +0100
From: Jeroen Roovers <jer@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] QA: package.mask policies
Message-ID: <20091111174356.4274155e@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net>
In-Reply-To: <200911081820.04313.scarabeus@gentoo.org>
References: <200911071824.16651.scarabeus@gentoo.org>
	<20091108175710.49302d71@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net>
	<200911081820.04313.scarabeus@gentoo.org>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.3 (GTK+ 2.16.6; i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner
X-Archives-Salt: f9f38af3-29ad-4f77-9a16-2ebdde7004f7
X-Archives-Hash: 024fbbb7c7933ea00bad81640eb298c8

On Sun, 8 Nov 2009 18:20:00 +0100
Tom=C3=A1=C5=A1 Chv=C3=A1tal <scarabeus@gentoo.org> wrote:

> But if we look on tag of screen-4.0.3 or its release:
>  screen-4.0.2.tar.gz        27-Jan-2004 05:46  821K =20
>  screen-4.0.2.tar.gz.sig    27-Jan-2004 05:47   65  =20
>  screen-4.0.3.tar.gz        07-Aug-2008 06:30  821K =20
>  screen-4.0.3.tar.gz.sig    07-Aug-2008 06:30   65  =20
> You see the pattern? It is 1 year newer than it.

Correct. The snapshot should have been named _pre20070403.


Regards,
     jer