From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N7e98-0007fb-IA for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 23:59:42 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C57A4E087C; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 23:59:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DE6FE087C for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 23:59:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6B69679DC for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 23:59:39 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] QA is unimportant? Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 19:01:36 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.3 (Linux/2.6.31.4; KDE/4.3.3; x86_64; ; ) References: <200911092352.23709.patrick@gentoo.org> <200911091845.47107.vapier@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200911091845.47107.vapier@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart5694633.eSjUnvDsCx"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200911091901.36602.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 49a95bff-d4d3-4c86-aae2-58f0751213e3 X-Archives-Hash: 04685d442d7c2e86a50c8e60ca132c8a --nextPart5694633.eSjUnvDsCx Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Monday 09 November 2009 18:45:46 Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Monday 09 November 2009 17:52:23 Patrick Lauer wrote: > > On Monday 09 November 2009 21:16:28 Mike Frysinger wrote: > > And talking about glibc ... > > > > For 2.11 you didn't even test if all patches apply (bug #292139) >=20 > this example is bs and you know it. i'm not going to test every USE flag > combo, especially ones that take specific profiles. ignoring that, this = is > for configurations that another team handles. i'm not maintaining the > hardening patches. >=20 > > and maybe forgot to upload a patch (#292223) >=20 > yes, i roll so many patch tarballs that i sometimes forget to post some.= =20 > and it's not an obvious scenario to me since it emerges fine on my syste= m. also, unlike you, i acked/fixed the bugs right away instead of whining on a= =20 mailing list over and over that people are making you fix bugs you introduc= ed =2Dmike --nextPart5694633.eSjUnvDsCx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJK+K1gAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBo5QQANplbiiD+aWAiP9SI6Li7D2g TDkLSKjAoM+7D7NkLj2u39iW/VdkpI81Rkrt9NufS1wQBY/OAB6Va2AWDrehjh7Y 6uGyZiS9N1GLvAIQ4WIWefug9QixBIeO+JYpt+U9HZ+MENM/0NybwRxytEheWPS+ FISTnIfPeZ5RHrR0ujnaOrUuYREWvVv0lHDomYSzkWcyr9H7/wIgfI3DuNcf/IIt 7UNKsKjHZG+cSKCO66Ki77HMqDtyWP/meixMwa0LaDRwzyp+rempmPGGdACYpPkn aBe/1J0w8749xlBCzKM2RGSf9tYrIspcq0QP8d9kx2riFKyDXHscMcQKrwKduDlw j1JF+2ADZy/zAxCYDMQzJYjkpV476hfXCGO6Ll2QUxUnoKQGq/Y1bwZgH0RNgjmV lhinWG5E4E4BHApy6MjAGLWp/6tWVMYj5764pYJsBhcj85r787FhNIFF1uksiE1W VSdnMVZSYIYhFoxy538GKtXoF9FLsD47GRv079nczlLZka2qInGUPT0CJlPpKDfw 4wuwokJzqq+9vBF2XJ2A2CY1sVUvBz1fKrl+9KcWqggLQ4H4XzK5wsgdcSQdImvA uDh65nYH1pZttDwjD8bmHuO6vJmVOMxbkRbuPZ59tOIOZJRXNkqaRrqIN9qPXeCU Y9dhNWCZw8u6RrjFHLiT =qG8L -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart5694633.eSjUnvDsCx--