From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N79gG-0008A9-H8 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 08 Nov 2009 15:27:52 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 87F83E08F0; Sun, 8 Nov 2009 15:27:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6550AE08F0 for ; Sun, 8 Nov 2009 15:27:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5079677F7; Sun, 8 Nov 2009 15:27:50 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-forensics/foremost: ChangeLog foremost-1.5.6.ebuild Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 10:29:35 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/2.6.31.4; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Patrick Lauer , Petteri =?iso-8859-1?q?R=E4ty?= References: <4AF6DC18.2060303@gentoo.org> <200911081606.58723.patrick@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200911081606.58723.patrick@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1276752.1oQAHOFnPG"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200911081029.36730.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: cad92a68-a2cf-425e-8d67-725e12de2143 X-Archives-Hash: 8d408871f6464ed97ca9f8a6d584e3fb --nextPart1276752.1oQAHOFnPG Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sunday 08 November 2009 10:06:58 Patrick Lauer wrote: > So I'd appreciate if y'all stopped obsessing about such details and just > fix it instead of whining at me until my motivation takes a long walk on > the beach and doesn't return for quite some time. At least I'm trying to > keep these packages alive, which noone else seems to do. if you're introducing crap into the tree, then it is better if you took tha= t=20 long walk =2Dmike --nextPart1276752.1oQAHOFnPG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJK9uPgAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBqpIP/0UiyJgLCc3YjapxlV05DleG oYumzsV5qGBLSmFnO30mwnvrhtSkT4ttiJsj8MbIu94/BqU0r2IHkhWDSTHAlnTV 9XgLGzkxmvRgzSY+WK4lbbpq5d8sHlO2mDCn7DDxMxoL6NMO7WFjbiFqE1wqmBfi sSLNp3O1zKv0kvrb33B8xBIZ85k4QWT/+I5iQOpttZjTUN0a+5lK4LM4b79UYtLj o5QjU3F/z+BIZp0pZ6zRs8TwKYIat0wYuiD7tCkPudwqGHSdnUFEckVxuRXQDStb 5LwH70DHaoeZAH8HDoN4PKFXxb6Dhf9R8fP60V2rf5Qq9HNw3v0+O6Cm50ZVfIff B0OOS3nA36P8n/f439ovaVLqtSQOLLk0sdEp4GeopcJUgQteMTrH4Okt5CsVqx+s 2fPGn6SWub6PwUE6u9WLemPI+7VmRDVxO+cfBw7zO/i1zkqv8yQ7U3da3w5E95/y eGj7ZlObHjMiF+U6+6N913+AUjdb1FHfYIoqYACy6NUFBLSftcm/3hBMx9FAFl33 fj4hi/CVlM1N6zAEKnGVZvsIM+g4Nnt7rV0HFSczZnKL9hdXlgpruHssnhRq4TO6 +nMIKQHMCuIO8BP3BG2Dmxoltx8SJ4edbLJOpzQ2lARKqOcCqcmhYkCfR7hk5WIV WJfZWbPa14eoF+V2RU9k =KWEb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1276752.1oQAHOFnPG--