From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N6m40-0004A8-28 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 07 Nov 2009 14:14:53 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C47C5E0795; Sat, 7 Nov 2009 14:14:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eric.schwarzvogel.de (eric.schwarzvogel.de [194.97.4.250]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FF29E0795 for ; Sat, 7 Nov 2009 14:14:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from klausman by eric.schwarzvogel.de with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1N6m3w-0007kj-Hj for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 07 Nov 2009 15:14:44 +0100 Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 15:14:44 +0100 From: Tobias Klausmann To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations Message-ID: <20091107141444.GA28658@eric.schwarzvogel.de> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <200911011736.38401.Arfrever@gentoo.org> <20091102151707.0b155aab@gentoo.org> <200911021724.01069.hwoarang@gentoo.org> <20091103191005.18d98e2e@gentoo.org> <4AF1EBD8.4020502@gentoo.org> <20091104214823.64842abd@gentoo.org> <20091105091700.GA17478@eric.schwarzvogel.de> <4AF331B0.4020108@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <4AF331B0.4020108@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: Tobias Klausmann X-Archives-Salt: b6010a07-1303-4b34-8ca4-efbf3fb4922c X-Archives-Hash: da38fc20028f3691a8ff412664fdea06 Hi!=20 On Thu, 05 Nov 2009, Petteri R=E4ty wrote: > In the past when smaller arches were not that active we used to > mark Java packages stable after testing by at least one arch > team. The probability to find arch specific issues in something > like Java is not so high so I think arrangements like this are > acceptable when the arch teams have problems keeping up. For alpha, the java keywording policy is easy: don't. We currently don't have any working JVM/JRE/JDK, so there's no point in adding Java packages. We *do* have dev-java/java-config keyworded, though the reason escapes me at the moment :) Regards, Tobias --=20 printk("NONONONOO!!!!\n"); linux-2.6.6/drivers/atm/zatm.c