From: Tobias Klausmann <klausman@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 15:14:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091107141444.GA28658@eric.schwarzvogel.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AF331B0.4020108@gentoo.org>
Hi!
On Thu, 05 Nov 2009, Petteri Räty wrote:
> In the past when smaller arches were not that active we used to
> mark Java packages stable after testing by at least one arch
> team. The probability to find arch specific issues in something
> like Java is not so high so I think arrangements like this are
> acceptable when the arch teams have problems keeping up.
For alpha, the java keywording policy is easy: don't.
We currently don't have any working JVM/JRE/JDK, so there's no
point in adding Java packages.
We *do* have dev-java/java-config keyworded, though the reason
escapes me at the moment :)
Regards,
Tobias
--
printk("NONONONOO!!!!\n");
linux-2.6.6/drivers/atm/zatm.c
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-07 14:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-01 16:36 [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2009-11-01 16:55 ` Mart Raudsepp
2009-11-01 18:19 ` Richard Freeman
2009-11-01 20:21 ` Petteri Räty
2009-11-01 21:16 ` [gentoo-dev] " Ryan Hill
2009-11-02 14:17 ` Christian Faulhammer
2009-11-02 15:23 ` Markos Chandras
2009-11-03 18:10 ` Christian Faulhammer
2009-11-04 12:36 ` Ben de Groot
2009-11-04 12:50 ` Christian Faulhammer
2009-11-04 18:01 ` Tobias Klausmann
2009-11-04 20:49 ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2009-11-04 21:02 ` Joseph Jezak
2009-11-05 3:48 ` Ryan Hill
2009-11-05 9:17 ` Tobias Klausmann
2009-11-05 20:12 ` Petteri Räty
2009-11-06 3:06 ` Joseph Jezak
2009-11-06 14:18 ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2009-11-06 14:45 ` Fabian Groffen
2009-11-06 17:06 ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2009-11-06 17:08 ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2009-11-07 5:13 ` Ryan Hill
2009-11-06 22:07 ` Zac Medico
2009-11-07 3:36 ` Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2009-11-07 14:54 ` Peter Volkov
2009-11-07 20:49 ` Zac Medico
2009-11-08 0:12 ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2009-11-08 9:31 ` Petteri Räty
2009-11-08 12:55 ` Peter Volkov
2009-11-09 2:34 ` Zac Medico
2009-11-08 9:05 ` Fabian Groffen
2009-11-08 12:53 ` Peter Volkov
2009-11-06 22:52 ` Rémi Cardona
2009-11-07 7:22 ` Hans de Graaff
2009-11-06 16:00 ` Kent Fredric
2009-11-06 17:00 ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2009-11-07 14:14 ` Tobias Klausmann [this message]
2009-11-05 10:52 ` Duncan
2009-11-06 17:18 ` Christian Faulhammer
2009-11-06 17:15 ` Christian Faulhammer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091107141444.GA28658@eric.schwarzvogel.de \
--to=klausman@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox