From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N6c4Q-00038z-Pe for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 07 Nov 2009 03:34:35 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1740FE0976; Sat, 7 Nov 2009 03:34:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9B72E0976 for ; Sat, 7 Nov 2009 03:34:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from afta-gentoo.localnet (ip-85-198-235-97.broker.com.pl [85.198.235.97]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBDE0679DF for ; Sat, 7 Nov 2009 03:34:30 +0000 (UTC) From: Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis To: Gentoo Development Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 04:36:51 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.3 (Linux/2.6.31-tuxonice-AFTA; KDE/4.3.3; x86_64; ; ) References: <200911011736.38401.Arfrever@gentoo.org> <20091106144535.GT1150@gentoo.org> <4AF49E3E.30307@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4AF49E3E.30307@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart4297114.pSqAbdaRG9"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200911070436.51263.Arfrever@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 120021f5-aab8-4a8f-a1fd-450648783bc0 X-Archives-Hash: 68dbffb6fe253f2f2d0863367d96fe70 --nextPart4297114.pSqAbdaRG9 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2009-11-06 23:07:58 Zac Medico napisa=C5=82(a): > Fabian Groffen wrote: > > On 06-11-2009 19:48:16 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > >> On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 1:42 AM, Petteri R=C3=A4ty wrote: > >>> In the past when smaller arches were not that active we used to mark > >>> Java packages stable after testing by at least one arch team. The > >>> probability to find arch specific issues in something like Java is not > >>> so high so I think arrangements like this are acceptable when the arch > >>> teams have problems keeping up. > >> I think the same should be extended to other languages such as Perl > >> and Python (unless they have portions which are C/C++) > >=20 > > Sounds like we could benefit from the "noarch" approach known in the RPM > > world, such that all these packages can also be immediately keyworded > > and stabilised for all arches. Would greatly simplify things for a > > great deal of packages, maybe? >=20 > We could introduce "noarch" and "~noarch" KEYWORDS, add "noarch" to > the default ACCEPT_KEYWORDS setting for all profiles, and instruct > unstable users to add "~noarch" to ACCEPT_KEYWORDS. It seems to be a good idea, but I would prefer to use words "universal" and "~universal" :) . =2D-=20 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis --nextPart4297114.pSqAbdaRG9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJK9OtTAAoJEFtpjAED8H0Y96YP/2Ak5nN4IxDRFgOUnRXzi+Il C81PBlWeYWpJQuFyS8Atki+yP4HdfbfF3v5DZ3USLC7JtY/SqDzyqSlhEsct53dy Mtz5Idwm1ZWDcnzXExjFZl8GtPFkhLcNG9Q/ho97WFSJtrRTTEhTRUTn/lpdxeMG dNvvHX73nM1Cj78A+9arxQbA3qq95pdAq4gvNdl9wIBqE76w7iNS3XJwbEXt5WcK 7R+XzzTpLU/xSMU5nLKsWSAaHhUViHaUSkTuHr15e1bNGD3ctEA77a7HTz/HnAqW 6+qpJyhkurU3KE9c2Yh+vskFYTwzPooV3oyOaP/6rHmnoDPMHdog7vKRvOQl4iBa vddRirX89wmJci3oxQ9O5+NmjD4Tz7m0TBnxGnJve8chc4FehHJOLhcGbAKq05BY tyv/gAyABv+Talp2wY3CCBEyIlx7tX9V3rmYdJsNYd6zOokBJDgtMLV1K8LOg92S Rbkyy8QKLdAbgcNP3Z3L6wSWE8sfaCbtJCcisy/psd905q+spJkxc2OE/tXxYLi5 XyIVBcTC3S9QN/3UC8fSzOremxbIu9CuBdCDgCRverkraGL0aueBKJS8LKG3lamj H8TQXJ7i8SQv8cZOggMp3vpfjrvi8cOTF4kv2legZpLeWYgEeEEbkh9iOSXAzJ1h VsD/WqZqKuBGP67qQgN+ =5EGc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4297114.pSqAbdaRG9--