From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N5y25-00021g-7Y for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2009 08:49:29 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 667C9E09A1; Thu, 5 Nov 2009 08:49:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wp165.webpack.hosteurope.de (wp165.webpack.hosteurope.de [80.237.132.172]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35A1EE09A1 for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2009 08:49:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 84-238-114-252.u.parknet.dk ([84.238.114.252] helo=marsupilami.localnet); authenticated by wp165.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) id 1N5y22-0003tq-6p; Thu, 05 Nov 2009 09:49:26 +0100 From: Thilo Bangert To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] a pragmatic approach to FEATURES [was FEATURES use or misuse?] Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 09:49:07 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/2.6.31.5; KDE/4.3.3; i686; ; ) References: <200911031648.04090.patrick@gentoo.org> <20091104193617.0248c03a@gentoo.org> <20091105045657.GB25976@hrair> In-Reply-To: <20091105045657.GB25976@hrair> Organization: Gentoo Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart4469998.D9KRART0gX"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200911050949.10627.bangert@gentoo.org> X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;bangert@gentoo.org;1257410967;1f4762d1; X-Archives-Salt: 80de278f-9259-4c81-a262-597f09a29cf5 X-Archives-Hash: 52cf83da239618ea27be1bf0667b58d1 --nextPart4469998.D9KRART0gX Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > Perhaps the pragmatic approach might be wise. >=20 when filing the FEATURES bugs, i (IIRC) tried to remain on the pragmatic=20 side, recognising the sometimes non-existing alternatives. ie. i didnt=20 open bugs for each and every FEATURES usage. the tracker bug is here: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D174335 --nextPart4469998.D9KRART0gX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkrykYYACgkQxRElEoA5AncJ/gCgn0yUIZkcxgnFNQvDWpVGZ84j LFMAmwSHORtamDBxJdqFMeck6TIDjx6y =eRdY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4469998.D9KRART0gX--