From: Tobias Klausmann <klausman@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 10:17:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091105091700.GA17478@eric.schwarzvogel.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091104214823.64842abd@gentoo.org>
Hi!
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009, Ryan Hill wrote:
> Is there any interest in allowing certain packages to be stabilized by the
> maintainer without going through the arch teams? I always feel guilty when i
> file stabilization bugs for app-doc pkgs.
I think for bugs which only install passive files (i.e. stuff
that doesn't "power" anything else), Keywording can be done by the
maintainer. Pure doc files (like selfhtml) are in that category.
Naturally, if a new version needs a new doc processing toolchain,
things are a bit different.
But as far as alpha is concerned: go ahead.
Regards,
Tobias
PS: I considered allowing the doc processing stuff, too, but it's
astoundingly easy to break some fairly important stuff just my
messing up DTDs.
--
printk("Pretending it's a 3/80, but very afraid...\n");
linux-2.6.19/arch/m68k/sun3x/prom.c
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-05 9:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-01 16:36 [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2009-11-01 16:55 ` Mart Raudsepp
2009-11-01 18:19 ` Richard Freeman
2009-11-01 20:21 ` Petteri Räty
2009-11-01 21:16 ` [gentoo-dev] " Ryan Hill
2009-11-02 14:17 ` Christian Faulhammer
2009-11-02 15:23 ` Markos Chandras
2009-11-03 18:10 ` Christian Faulhammer
2009-11-04 12:36 ` Ben de Groot
2009-11-04 12:50 ` Christian Faulhammer
2009-11-04 18:01 ` Tobias Klausmann
2009-11-04 20:49 ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2009-11-04 21:02 ` Joseph Jezak
2009-11-05 3:48 ` Ryan Hill
2009-11-05 9:17 ` Tobias Klausmann [this message]
2009-11-05 20:12 ` Petteri Räty
2009-11-06 3:06 ` Joseph Jezak
2009-11-06 14:18 ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2009-11-06 14:45 ` Fabian Groffen
2009-11-06 17:06 ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2009-11-06 17:08 ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2009-11-07 5:13 ` Ryan Hill
2009-11-06 22:07 ` Zac Medico
2009-11-07 3:36 ` Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2009-11-07 14:54 ` Peter Volkov
2009-11-07 20:49 ` Zac Medico
2009-11-08 0:12 ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2009-11-08 9:31 ` Petteri Räty
2009-11-08 12:55 ` Peter Volkov
2009-11-09 2:34 ` Zac Medico
2009-11-08 9:05 ` Fabian Groffen
2009-11-08 12:53 ` Peter Volkov
2009-11-06 22:52 ` Rémi Cardona
2009-11-07 7:22 ` Hans de Graaff
2009-11-06 16:00 ` Kent Fredric
2009-11-06 17:00 ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2009-11-07 14:14 ` Tobias Klausmann
2009-11-05 10:52 ` Duncan
2009-11-06 17:18 ` Christian Faulhammer
2009-11-06 17:15 ` Christian Faulhammer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091105091700.GA17478@eric.schwarzvogel.de \
--to=klausman@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox