From: Tobias Klausmann <klausman@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 19:01:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091104180104.GA18587@eric.schwarzvogel.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091104135038.098c7ef4@gentoo.org>
Hi!
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> Ben de Groot <yngwin@gentoo.org>:
> > What about ppc64? They are MONTHS behind on stabilization,
> > even for security bugs (see bug 281821 for example). The Qt team
> > feels this is no longer acceptable. We propose that any arch that
> > can't keep up will be demoted to experimental status.
>
> I surely subscribe to that. At the moment Brent (ranger) is
> definitely alone on that arch.
So am I on alpha.[0] It is doable, but it wears you thin - and
it's extra bad because it means I have hardly any free time to
mentor anybody.
That said, I hope whoever feels the need comes to me /before/ they
file a bug for "Let's make alpha experimental".
Regards,
Tobias
[0] Yes, armin76 helps, but he does so for many arches (and
around of applause for that), but the majority of bugs for alpha
are on my plate.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-04 18:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-01 16:36 [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2009-11-01 16:55 ` Mart Raudsepp
2009-11-01 18:19 ` Richard Freeman
2009-11-01 20:21 ` Petteri Räty
2009-11-01 21:16 ` [gentoo-dev] " Ryan Hill
2009-11-02 14:17 ` Christian Faulhammer
2009-11-02 15:23 ` Markos Chandras
2009-11-03 18:10 ` Christian Faulhammer
2009-11-04 12:36 ` Ben de Groot
2009-11-04 12:50 ` Christian Faulhammer
2009-11-04 18:01 ` Tobias Klausmann [this message]
2009-11-04 20:49 ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2009-11-04 21:02 ` Joseph Jezak
2009-11-05 3:48 ` Ryan Hill
2009-11-05 9:17 ` Tobias Klausmann
2009-11-05 20:12 ` Petteri Räty
2009-11-06 3:06 ` Joseph Jezak
2009-11-06 14:18 ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2009-11-06 14:45 ` Fabian Groffen
2009-11-06 17:06 ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2009-11-06 17:08 ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2009-11-07 5:13 ` Ryan Hill
2009-11-06 22:07 ` Zac Medico
2009-11-07 3:36 ` Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2009-11-07 14:54 ` Peter Volkov
2009-11-07 20:49 ` Zac Medico
2009-11-08 0:12 ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2009-11-08 9:31 ` Petteri Räty
2009-11-08 12:55 ` Peter Volkov
2009-11-09 2:34 ` Zac Medico
2009-11-08 9:05 ` Fabian Groffen
2009-11-08 12:53 ` Peter Volkov
2009-11-06 22:52 ` Rémi Cardona
2009-11-07 7:22 ` Hans de Graaff
2009-11-06 16:00 ` Kent Fredric
2009-11-06 17:00 ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2009-11-07 14:14 ` Tobias Klausmann
2009-11-05 10:52 ` Duncan
2009-11-06 17:18 ` Christian Faulhammer
2009-11-06 17:15 ` Christian Faulhammer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091104180104.GA18587@eric.schwarzvogel.de \
--to=klausman@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox