From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N5fKn-0004EW-TQ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:51:34 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2C4E7E0B2D; Wed, 4 Nov 2009 12:51:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mo-p05-ob.rzone.de (mo-p05-ob.rzone.de [81.169.146.180]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3A0AE0B2D for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2009 12:51:31 +0000 (UTC) X-RZG-AUTH: :K2kKYU+nW/MMMlTokcN5Yot1/Bj/FTl+WviP6RIJci0HRMpbh/x+X6ShNgXVOTo6Eri82lrb X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo05 Received: from localhost (p4FC86303.dip.t-dialin.net [79.200.99.3]) by post.strato.de (fruni mo17) (RZmta 22.1) with ESMTP id w042c8lA4C8NAc for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2009 13:51:30 +0100 (MET) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 13:50:38 +0100 From: Christian Faulhammer To: Gentoo Development Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations Message-ID: <20091104135038.098c7ef4@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: References: <200911011736.38401.Arfrever@gentoo.org> <20091102151707.0b155aab@gentoo.org> <200911021724.01069.hwoarang@gentoo.org> <20091103191005.18d98e2e@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.3 (GTK+ 2.16.6; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/YkyeFxdwp.kISmOmY.uUoAQ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: c81e3d87-c133-4b6f-8eb7-74c32695ddb2 X-Archives-Hash: 31b054016325f5fb2ef294d1e108001c --Sig_/YkyeFxdwp.kISmOmY.uUoAQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Ben de Groot : > What about ppc64? They are MONTHS behind on stabilization, > even for security bugs (see bug 281821 for example). The Qt team > feels this is no longer acceptable. We propose that any arch that > can't keep up will be demoted to experimental status. I surely subscribe to that. At the moment Brent (ranger) is definitely alone on that arch. V-Li --=20 Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project , #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode --Sig_/YkyeFxdwp.kISmOmY.uUoAQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkrxeKkACgkQNQqtfCuFneP1iACdGRqDLM+Bhj0etUIRgSXrEjE7 FVUAmwSgNbr+Fd7fUMPPGg0d5qgs7Q9r =4jgF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/YkyeFxdwp.kISmOmY.uUoAQ--