From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N2yK9-0003wW-RL for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 02:31:46 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BEA52E0898; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 02:31:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90568E0898 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 02:31:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F47267B91 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 02:31:44 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Unused ebuild built_with_use cleanup Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:31:57 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/2.6.31.4; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; ) References: <4AC20C83.3050904@gentoo.org> <200910270946.12243.vapier@gentoo.org> <4AE74007.5060908@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4AE74007.5060908@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1293241.e6pr5zFGm0"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200910272231.57686.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 6d261235-c767-467f-ad5a-8b98b2433a59 X-Archives-Hash: 127c0b8c9d7fb73ebf3e4fd8c934cf5f --nextPart1293241.e6pr5zFGm0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tuesday 27 October 2009 14:46:31 Petteri R=C3=A4ty wrote: > Normally old versions are not kept around as already said if you read > the thread. "normal" is not the same thing as "always". unless you're the maintainer, = you=20 have no idea whether old versions are kept there on purpose. ive had peopl= e=20 delete older versions of packages on me simply because they made this inval= id=20 assumption without talking to the maintainer. the rest of the thread is=20 irrelevant as this point was not made. a quick check of your list shows wine/uclibc shouldnt be blindly culled. > Live ebuilds shouldn't really have been in the original list > with my intended logic. For them I will usually just migrate them to > EAPI 2 like with other packages we have been touching. OK > Using a tracker bug makes sense if you expect some action from individual > maintainers which is not the case here as they can just leave the job to > people nuking built_with_use like me. i dont plan on fixing my ebuilds soonish since this isnt a terribly importa= nt=20 issue, but they'll get fixed at some point =2Dmike --nextPart1293241.e6pr5zFGm0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJK560dAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBUQEP/0wFyEe/o5A4MUlFZ4iGPbME NQynn9EdpX0CYYXRetJ6r2bIfl48gQT38ZcHh3Q1qnWCrF/cs5sZzdXzw/Js9ddX ZiVVabPHYO06as4C4isL8J/eBMZQpoSAoXP9vhPC7cdspCDF8KrClQf5mmX/JdMa M+ZCilgkhL+7ZavClfPxEBFO8kFNBwi6Jawt56j6BnxXDfM3rtGmli6UVkIIb+x5 PGplbX4EqOBxEAmWoo2hlBAX8elPF6zjLQr6vDFndrt9ifAONPbQXxzAD/7waGfV HKTzxnHZF739xsOqZCezKEbw6CjeyDTvmSUY/CkEsLpzXShQSoNVimmS6aPsgtW3 Aay8oW8CYrioiWcmTdvms32TzK+WWUA5NrbRX9q3pXL9kTB9l3EUjsHxI7eE2oVT r9S3Z8ktcaW2G+ugU+wrNjRsFB9CzHrfsGDcyXKO5C23OjdvhniG1Xj6tZF001tp QNmZTdT7hC/Shhg3lLdY37Pz7kDVwgP0ELFh08AH8LlbvaJ0m+2E4bftYug8pZsZ hNzqW+9EOq1dHvsVDIrqT4udMZS68SgXmScVPN6C2tJQO+4kIaKWkqO2jXgET+9I 0m2PcP3aAPiz6w0C8xQXzxn9UCeYste9i38TWUlbbhxJvrPOwTfu0pGsscug1O7s uPnXFQH2Y1aACbXmeNFs =Z9ys -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1293241.e6pr5zFGm0--