From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N1mnF-0002Mr-7F for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2009 20:00:54 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 270B9E077D; Sat, 24 Oct 2009 20:00:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from amun.cheops.ods.org (amun.cheops.ods.org [82.95.138.191]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA01EE077D for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2009 20:00:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tefnut.cheops.ods.org ([2001:888:1022:0:211:24ff:fe37:e46e] helo=gentoo.org) by amun.cheops.ods.org with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1N1mnC-0000oI-IC for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2009 22:00:51 +0200 Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2009 22:00:05 +0200 From: Fabian Groffen To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Prefix: on EPREFIX, ED and EROOT inside ebuilds Message-ID: <20091024200005.GN20090@gentoo.org> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <20091018091154.GB464@gentoo.org> <200910181357.10183.scarabeus@gentoo.org> <20091018123114.GG464@gentoo.org> <20091019194459.GY464@gentoo.org> <4AE3577A.1090000@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4AE3577A.1090000@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (Darwin 8.11.0, VIM - Vi IMproved 7.2) Organization: Gentoo Foundation, Inc. X-Content-Scanned: by amun.cheops.ods.org (Exim Exiscan) using SpamAssassin and ClamAV Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 67436c08-57ad-473c-91dd-d26723bbea02 X-Archives-Hash: 9bc668704180ff9c29e61a1be5c40310 On 24-10-2009 22:37:30 +0300, Petteri R=C3=A4ty wrote: > > The suggestion was to just introduce EAPI=3D3 with these variables, a= nd > > making everything which is scheduled for current EAPI=3D3 just EAPI=3D= 4. I > > was told we could quite quickly have a Portage in the tree that would > > set ED and EROOT for EAPI=3D3 that way. >=20 > Maybe 2+prefix is a more describing name? This would avoid changing wha= t > EAPI 3 means. Naming is up to others, from my point of view. > > Are there any objections to this? If not, I'd like to put this on th= e > > agenda for the next council meeting. >=20 > As the council decided to add new stuff in the last meeting if zac is > starting to implement new EAPIs this could go into EAPI 3 too. Yes, this was implicit, the next EAPI should contain the same support too. --=20 Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level