From: Fabian Groffen <grobian@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Prefix: on EPREFIX, ED and EROOT inside ebuilds
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2009 22:00:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091024200005.GN20090@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AE3577A.1090000@gentoo.org>
On 24-10-2009 22:37:30 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
> > The suggestion was to just introduce EAPI=3 with these variables, and
> > making everything which is scheduled for current EAPI=3 just EAPI=4. I
> > was told we could quite quickly have a Portage in the tree that would
> > set ED and EROOT for EAPI=3 that way.
>
> Maybe 2+prefix is a more describing name? This would avoid changing what
> EAPI 3 means.
Naming is up to others, from my point of view.
> > Are there any objections to this? If not, I'd like to put this on the
> > agenda for the next council meeting.
>
> As the council decided to add new stuff in the last meeting if zac is
> starting to implement new EAPIs this could go into EAPI 3 too.
Yes, this was implicit, the next EAPI should contain the same support
too.
--
Fabian Groffen
Gentoo on a different level
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-24 20:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-18 9:11 [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Prefix: on EPREFIX, ED and EROOT inside ebuilds Fabian Groffen
2009-10-18 11:57 ` Tomáš Chvátal
2009-10-18 12:31 ` Fabian Groffen
2009-10-19 19:44 ` Fabian Groffen
2009-10-24 19:37 ` Petteri Räty
2009-10-24 20:00 ` Fabian Groffen [this message]
2009-11-13 11:43 ` Ulrich Mueller
2009-11-20 8:45 ` Fabian Groffen
2009-11-20 0:26 ` Denis Dupeyron
2009-11-20 1:42 ` Jeremy Olexa
2009-11-20 9:03 ` Fabian Groffen
2009-11-25 23:43 ` Denis Dupeyron
2009-11-26 8:53 ` Fabian Groffen
2009-11-26 10:01 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2009-11-26 10:10 ` Fabian Groffen
2009-11-26 10:37 ` Duncan
2009-11-26 10:51 ` Fabian Groffen
2009-11-26 12:36 ` Duncan
2009-11-26 15:26 ` Fabian Groffen
2009-11-26 13:43 ` [gentoo-dev] " Fabian Groffen
2009-11-26 0:01 ` Denis Dupeyron
2009-11-26 9:02 ` Fabian Groffen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091024200005.GN20090@gentoo.org \
--to=grobian@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox