From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mzf3J-0003Wn-El for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 18 Oct 2009 23:20:41 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5A583E0746; Sun, 18 Oct 2009 23:20:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mo-p05-ob.rzone.de (mo-p05-ob.rzone.de [81.169.146.182]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE6C8E0746 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2009 23:20:38 +0000 (UTC) X-RZG-AUTH: :K2kKYU+nW/MMMlTokcN5Yot1/Bj/FTl+WviP6RIJci0HRMpbh/x+X6ShNgXVOTo6Era02lu2ICY= X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo05 Received: from localhost (p4FC847CE.dip.t-dialin.net [79.200.71.206]) by post.strato.de (klopstock mo61) (RZmta 22.1) with ESMTP id o074f6l9IN76qx for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 01:20:37 +0200 (MEST) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 01:20:12 +0200 From: Christian Faulhammer To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: openrc-0.5.1 arrived in the tree Message-ID: <20091019012012.0bca9243@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200910141324.50697.scarabeus@gentoo.org> References: <200910091957.09193.zzam@gentoo.org> <20091014031037.4a3b023b@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net> <8b4c83ad0910140419w270d26e7lf1d37d920f851ab7@mail.gmail.com> <200910141324.50697.scarabeus@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.3 (GTK+ 2.16.6; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/sQ1WKKO90BlC/cFYgKFDJ9R"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 44d84668-fcba-41ab-96b3-1af8e471d12a X-Archives-Hash: 712028e9d5a823b01b78b2c9bbd8ad0a --Sig_/sQ1WKKO90BlC/cFYgKFDJ9R Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Tom=C3=A1=C5=A1 Chv=C3=A1tal : > Actualy i would like to hear what we in KDE did too, we publish into > the tree as 0 days bump mostly since 4.2 and 4.1 was in the tree > right away when we had working configuration. Your bumping is excellent, no discussion here. Gnome does a really good job in figuring out what packages need to go stable along with their newest release, maybe that is easier for them. With the ongoing KDE 4 stabilisation, I have seen a lot of stabilisation requests filed by Samuli, which should have been already there, filed by the KDE team. Figuring out what will be broken with such a major release and trying to get the stable tree on par is what eats a lot of time for us architecture developers...you can ease that by researching beforehand (with a stable chroot for example). V-Li --=20 Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project , #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode --Sig_/sQ1WKKO90BlC/cFYgKFDJ9R Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkrboqwACgkQNQqtfCuFneNF5wCfQwdJpksFwXmvahJbQJEKc1MR 9akAnju37CUmg2zqaOw+28AeVylgvlIL =XxZm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/sQ1WKKO90BlC/cFYgKFDJ9R--