From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1My20H-0002Gx-Fb for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 11:26:50 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C848CE058A; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 11:26:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F768E058A for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 11:26:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from arcarius.localnet (smer.tone.cz [89.250.247.23]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14763B4F36 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 11:26:47 +0000 (UTC) From: =?utf-8?q?Tom=C3=A1=C5=A1_Chv=C3=A1tal?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc-0.5.1 arrived in the tree Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:24:46 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/2.6.31-gentoo-r2; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; ) References: <200910091957.09193.zzam@gentoo.org> <20091014031037.4a3b023b@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net> <8b4c83ad0910140419w270d26e7lf1d37d920f851ab7@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <8b4c83ad0910140419w270d26e7lf1d37d920f851ab7@mail.gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart6010769.y0uP2JHbNC"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200910141324.50697.scarabeus@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: bceccf58-c668-42cd-a76d-4b141061f04a X-Archives-Hash: 5d6134c243f960a148727c221becfd97 --nextPart6010769.y0uP2JHbNC Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dne st=C5=99eda 14 =C5=98=C3=ADjen 2009 13:19:42 Nirbheek Chauhan napsal(a): > [completely offtopic from this thread, please fork thread if/when replyin= g] >=20 > On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 6:40 AM, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > > Since the advent of outside overlays and layman, > > we've seen many more bugs that only got discovered when the tree was > > synced with some developer overlay, or when a Great Unveiling was done > > after limited, private, small scale testing (as with many GNOME and KDE > > releases, not to point the finger). >=20 > If GNOME is involved, I would like you to point some fingers and tell > us exactly where you think we went wrong; exactly which "Great > Unveiling" are you talking about? If you don't tell us what we did > wrong, you surely can't expect us to fix the problem :) >=20 > All GNOME releases are incremental, so in 99% of the cases, the > migration path is straightforward. If as an hppa arch dev, if you were > inconvenienced, we would like to correct the problem since it would've > definitely affected other archs too (and we know how understaffed you > guys are :) >=20 Actualy i would like to hear what we in KDE did too, we publish into the tr= ee=20 as 0 days bump mostly since 4.2 and 4.1 was in the tree right away when we = had=20 working configuration. But aparently thats not enough... --nextPart6010769.y0uP2JHbNC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkrVtQIACgkQHB6c3gNBRYfSCQCgxW2G8du9R6DHoXFlZfftaoZp /qMAoMR1OwYC1xZe8h5a6LkaHmu6e4gw =aurH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart6010769.y0uP2JHbNC--