From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MxqLF-0006zN-2R for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 22:59:41 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2429DE07AB; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 22:59:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server2.mybetter.com (www.elementaldesign.net [208.110.83.190]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 114E3E07AB for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 22:59:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ctf.subverted.org) by server2.mybetter.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MxqLB-0008E8-47 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:59:37 -0500 Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 16:59:26 -0600 From: schism@subverted.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc-0.5.1 arrived in the tree Message-ID: <20091013225925.GA28104@ctf.subverted.org> References: <200910091957.09193.zzam@gentoo.org> <200910131815.52307.vapier@gentoo.org> <4AD51E4F.1090105@avtomatika.com> <200910140052.06682.cla@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200910140052.06682.cla@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Antivirus-Scanner: Clean mail though you should still use an Antivirus Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 38962979-5179-48f7-889e-191397d481df X-Archives-Hash: 309ecb75b042f5f7e7707e8a5a4c4a6f On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 12:52:06AM +0200, Dawid W=C4=99gli=C5=84ski wrote= : > sapphire ~ # qlist openrc | grep doc > /usr/share/doc/openrc/net.example > /usr/share/doc/openrc/net.default That would be lovely if the concerns being raised weren't about 0.5.1, that's the output from a 0.4.3 series install.