From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mxrv9-0005B6-EK for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 00:40:51 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EF5C6E06B3; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 00:40:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C87BCE06B3 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 00:40:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56AC066085 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 00:40:49 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc-0.5.1 arrived in the tree Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 20:40:48 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.1 (Linux/2.6.31; KDE/4.3.1; x86_64; ; ) References: <200910091957.09193.zzam@gentoo.org> <200910132022.58491.vapier@gentoo.org> <4AD5393C.1060306@avtomatika.com> In-Reply-To: <4AD5393C.1060306@avtomatika.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2073917.2pxCyV0WO8"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200910132040.48456.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 5e974f58-094b-476c-9f8d-183e5236ef56 X-Archives-Hash: cc99910615a50cc5490a86d20186d8ec --nextPart2073917.2pxCyV0WO8 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tuesday 13 October 2009 22:36:44 Branko Badrljica wrote: > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > the mailing list is not bugzilla. any complaints you have about > > USE=3Doldnet have nothing to do with this thread. it's a bug and shoul= d be > > treated as such. >=20 > Which is why I have posted here to gripe about having documented such > changes in future. USE=3Doldnet is documented, end of story. you're complaining about a *bug*= , not=20 lack of documentation. stop mixing the two as you're only muddling this=20 thread. =2Dmike --nextPart2073917.2pxCyV0WO8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJK1R4QAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBUsgP/3ma5SUI1s2gSIv7A1JqUZBz Dr+NCN9EyG4eDtK9k/e62YmMbBHfXycD2yKsIONQqFaKonooA5c/GthGw8VcQQVz ZeMJSbAo0JDvRuqjpA/yATGohye2NjQ7Y08QMFZWSAtEMtM3dIU+yLQosYfwwBa+ owzYvbFbRI53Vfs607gn+Vdejb2wUBFPc597bTPAMya9OAQ/DeMvq0PAKR03OLMv PF670VFTMu/wv5CLlBBWKMnU3QeHe7ech1S5plwlBrdsV0Z3gMA38Bk3OxHzhzOS HEZQeGFbovCazEG0v4Q+/0SajXw3AbD+G2teDruGqwgFeliqecd+9P5YKxqfns8Z Deb3w54tg6Rxtw9mhXfRFsWEX3fpK4A2mB0ObaAoYSwVijNXkS63P/sM2PnRY2/z PTCEpTAVNmkDv/1u22UmahF2dzHkVqnjnzpFka5D16TqeB/OWItDPOCR4gLlJS9t ic8tORW1u4DdsFMI3RBU+bLt4OJys0gCMIWE3f1dwVagEnL1tQiIYWOzDvlF148a nobrAUf2HYzUN2ab4nYTFZwPY1FC78FVmx6LClL0giEZumNtC97eWqPVsRM2WDJh iK3A7Saaep16f1qQabn+UbZVV/XBkiGeRYqkZ0uxOSyFc8X+M/Z2FzbMQN/ufwnB 4O74c74rHRyLig/M0ImW =7MIl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2073917.2pxCyV0WO8--