From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mxqag-0000pt-4t for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 23:15:38 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8EABDE0724; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 23:15:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68D99E0724 for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 23:15:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DFE56785F for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 23:15:35 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc-0.5.1 arrived in the tree Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 19:15:34 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.1 (Linux/2.6.31; KDE/4.3.1; x86_64; ; ) References: <200910091957.09193.zzam@gentoo.org> <200910140052.06682.cla@gentoo.org> <20091013225925.GA28104@ctf.subverted.org> In-Reply-To: <20091013225925.GA28104@ctf.subverted.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1334975.Aax5GPcbsj"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200910131915.34883.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: e71067e3-c7b6-4cb6-b79f-194f8c4a30c3 X-Archives-Hash: 6f6e972928b392615c07950d63ef2363 --nextPart1334975.Aax5GPcbsj Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tuesday 13 October 2009 18:59:26 schism@subverted.org wrote: > On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 12:52:06AM +0200, Dawid W=C4=99gli=C5=84ski wrote: > > sapphire ~ # qlist openrc | grep doc > > /usr/share/doc/openrc/net.example > > /usr/share/doc/openrc/net.default >=20 > That would be lovely if the concerns being raised weren't about 0.5.1, > that's the output from a 0.4.3 series install. you might want to check your facts before e-mailing. the output in questio= n=20 is matches both versions in the default install. =2Dmike --nextPart1334975.Aax5GPcbsj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJK1QoWAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WB1hQQANviXBh5tIX5tfxRQ/0ZmvkR uOcslJbkzRphf8LByuWmibibYCr93ZfPebR4k2+FMJJ4jsbPw62KVW0Cu8gtyiUZ OT6DqfFeDFQ8pFqUbjJNq/GOnRRvxGW3zuM3s3QDBJ9mZtGB4yBABugujWk49l7f Owxt7mAALcuvk4Iey8zdjG3uPyC3IKZ/5gPrjaNZokmE1o54qgbinShmLFJh7qaO 4wvAyXzzB4kccmkC9LA9AulNo51DwkXCQmOZkGtIKiINQkGwwshmxkBhzM/xYx1H +lklVQbk8ZOsMTF0K1cBZFMPbevVjJfhTqWBzesQ8tXRQrSRfVpHvxmzSMO2FFX1 Pfwo8ZBwBWrxcUNhjBHioZpKHLhet4pry5COxAXYfNe+UNIrBjwC0ciJ2ayKW56R 1RZU8r/cimVgDVnXmPEGZQBrbW/tNp3o+CpGwdO05Xrio6OJI3KtUENaqrbGtvMr zNSgL+AQETgpsF3Qs4gU4JHrkzY6KZwLlPE2uIeH7mDHswWr0yDC6uJpficpFjvv 3Pzu/aaeGuWfvKWkxYTOSEbDldFHIg3qQctWFavDs+Bml9tJ4OxF9Ct1XSdRheD/ Ti0KjYbs3+/qfWcxO3UH0W7u/jxJ3aiOiHZdrJpUEOUBQ5Wk1Wb0nJVjf3QYR4TD lVxX3V/MB3+UImpda9+K =84PG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1334975.Aax5GPcbsj--