From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mwia1-0007dU-U5 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 10 Oct 2009 20:30:18 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E3073E0774; Sat, 10 Oct 2009 20:30:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5CF4E0774 for ; Sat, 10 Oct 2009 20:30:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail01.m-online.net (mail.m-online.net [192.168.3.149]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E89091C1548A; Sat, 10 Oct 2009 22:30:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (dynscan2.mnet-online.de [192.168.1.215]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3E699010B; Sat, 10 Oct 2009 22:30:14 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.3.149]) by localhost (dynscan2.mnet-online.de [192.168.1.215]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NXkpjBQ0dOeB; Sat, 10 Oct 2009 22:30:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gauss.x.fun (ppp-88-217-118-197.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.118.197]) by mail.nefkom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP; Sat, 10 Oct 2009 22:30:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gauss.x.fun (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F33B23C97C; Sat, 10 Oct 2009 22:30:12 +0200 (CEST) From: Matthias Schwarzott To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc-0.5.1 arrived in the tree Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 22:30:05 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 Cc: Nirbheek Chauhan References: <200910091957.09193.zzam@gentoo.org> <4AD08859.8020806@gentoo.org> <8b4c83ad0910100622u502a69bdy6a9aaca18304cd48@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <8b4c83ad0910100622u502a69bdy6a9aaca18304cd48@mail.gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200910102230.07124.zzam@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: af48a779-5d29-451b-93c4-788177f3665f X-Archives-Hash: 88cbb316a27a30f34a0ef82056fce9a4 On Samstag, 10. Oktober 2009, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 6:42 PM, Alin N=C4=83stac wro= te: > > On 10/9/09 7:57 PM, Matthias Schwarzott wrote: > >> * does new scripts already can do all that was possible with net.* ? > > > > No. PPP is not compatible with the new scripts. > > Major regression. It never pays to drop surprises on people like this. > I *strongly* suggest masking openrc-0.5.1 until the documentation is > updated and a news file is sent. Why do you suggest masking it immediately? Emerging it without changing any use-flags, has oldnet enabled by default, = so=20 user gets exactly the same net init-scripts as with openrc-0.4 before, so=20 where is the regression that needs to be masked? One can still use the same stuff and nobody is forced to transition to the = new=20 network script. Regards Matthias