From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-37929-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1MuAIZ-0005T3-AF
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 03 Oct 2009 19:29:43 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 570AFE0A90;
Sat, 3 Oct 2009 19:29:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ew0-f222.google.com (mail-ew0-f222.google.com [209.85.219.222])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16A49E0A90
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 3 Oct 2009 19:29:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by ewy22 with SMTP id 22so1814108ewy.14
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 03 Oct 2009 12:29:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject
:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version
:content-type;
bh=p2ki2u22cCl1jdqvGPlSNCyvraSdGRbCGyCxMAnDf/g=;
b=XNZt4UeXkndXUpOmpLVvTchsK4oj5j4o+pnxPGMT3udEk9dzGxONx4Q3ADgHGk66+9
NB0XL6qULcINUb8xK42a+ap+EpThGaQrcgWvwZN5smoTZeJ1v5HnGDjZ4oQLwLnjkzA4
kZl5qb7cu4gOrrwewLyjN4DXLfdVwz8Quw7EA=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer
:mime-version:content-type;
b=BiBg12BW2f0M3FsN8VTznvWKHQ9N9Gzw8xjic16+NIVRrVUXcx7sd0HlCUgnu2GGdn
vOxTzVxYbkUzURRYk2EyhavSpMpqLx9vOCVn25j53z+8WQpWaOipXaoLA9joZcZe+h8f
DxNOg8zhIqCLGvj2UXYMO9MjjMNP39O71OD0M=
Received: by 10.211.139.16 with SMTP id r16mr4983390ebn.89.1254598181289;
Sat, 03 Oct 2009 12:29:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from snowcone (92-235-187-79.cable.ubr18.sgyl.blueyonder.co.uk [92.235.187.79])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 7sm697886eyg.43.2009.10.03.12.29.40
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
Sat, 03 Oct 2009 12:29:41 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 20:29:29 +0100
From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: LD_AS_NEEDED="1" in
profiles/targets/developer/make.defaults?
Message-ID: <20091003202929.2a56a1b2@snowcone>
In-Reply-To: <4AC7A277.7040300@gentoo.org>
References: <4AC7A277.7040300@gentoo.org>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.2 (GTK+ 2.16.6; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1;
boundary="Sig_/A6kcyDyzH0a_beTaTI44lvb"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Archives-Salt: 8bec3d7f-cfb6-48a4-9fbc-c5bfdf35ad6b
X-Archives-Hash: 630321bd1810f2bc13168668901a35b2
--Sig_/A6kcyDyzH0a_beTaTI44lvb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sat, 03 Oct 2009 22:13:59 +0300
Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Since new binutils will support LD_AS_NEEDED=3D"1" to force ld behave
> asneeded we could use this for the developer -target in profiles?
>=20
> Speak up if you think it's a terrible idea.
Well, it does break correct code, so it's about on par with forcing
-ffast-math or -fno-exceptions or -fvisibility-inlines-hidden on
globally...
--=20
Ciaran McCreesh
--Sig_/A6kcyDyzH0a_beTaTI44lvb
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkrHpiIACgkQ96zL6DUtXhFYSQCggDWuTPArZe4TB1GiboyzsQQA
rbIAn3wYzEWe9TsRkVuxbobML4jddgMb
=7uui
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Sig_/A6kcyDyzH0a_beTaTI44lvb--