public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Victor Ostorga <vostorga@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone interested in maintaining the Gentoo Handbooks?
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 09:25:43 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091003092543.259f39db@bit> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AC765A7.6030301@allenjb.me.uk>

On Sat, 03 Oct 2009 15:54:31 +0100
AllenJB <gentoo-lists@allenjb.me.uk> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> The situation with the Gentoo Handbook is quite frankly getting
> beyond a joke for those of us donating our time to help users.
> 
> I have tried to bring up the issues on the docs team list but pretty
> much get shot down and told everything is fine and dandy.
> 
> For example, quoteth the Handbook at:
> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?part=1&chap=5
> Most PC users should use the stage3-i686-2008.0.tar.bz2 stage3
> archive.
> 
> This results in users starting out with a version of portage that
> doesn't understand EAPI-2. Guess what happens next.
> 
> I personally would happily donate my time to working on the docs, if
> only it didn't involve a markup language nobody else uses. I
> suggested a closed wiki for official documentation, but was again
> shot down saying that the existing team (who seem to be doing
> nothing) would need to reskill and that the server admins dislike
> wikis.
> 
> Is it really satisfactory that the official install documentation
> results in a basically non-working install?
> 

I have seen many users happy with the unofficial wiki idea, and they
have expressed a "official" wiki would be great, and I share the same
idea.

Víctor



  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-03 15:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-03 14:54 [gentoo-dev] Anyone interested in maintaining the Gentoo Handbooks? AllenJB
2009-10-03 15:25 ` Victor Ostorga [this message]
2009-10-03 16:07 ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2009-10-03 17:03   ` AllenJB
2009-10-03 17:51     ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2009-10-03 21:17     ` [gentoo-dev] " Nandeep Mali
2009-10-03 16:17 ` David Abbott
2009-10-03 17:32   ` Dawid Węgliński
2009-10-03 17:45     ` Markos Chandras
2009-10-04  1:13       ` Joshua Saddler
2009-10-04 10:28         ` Richard Freeman
2009-10-03 17:11 ` N J
2009-10-03 18:57 ` Joseph Jezak
2009-10-03 20:14 ` [gentoo-dev] " Ryan Hill
2009-10-03 23:44 ` [gentoo-dev] " Joshua Saddler
2009-10-03 23:58   ` AllenJB
2009-10-04  0:54     ` Joshua Saddler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091003092543.259f39db@bit \
    --to=vostorga@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox