From: Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <Arfrever@gentoo.org>
To: Gentoo Development <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Stabilization of Python 3.1
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 17:24:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200909201725.00070.Arfrever@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19e69baf3d2d95babe2abc5f89c4322d@localhost>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 1958 bytes --]
2009-09-20 16:53:37 Jesús Guerrero napisał(a):
> On Sun, 20 Sep 2009 00:41:32 +0200, Dawid Węgliński <cla@gentoo.org>
> wrote:
> > On Sunday 20 of September 2009 00:32:28 Dale wrote:
> >> >
> >> > ~arch is for testing ebuilds, not the upstream package
> >>
> >> So it would be OK to mark something "stable" even tho portage itself
> >> doesn't work with it? Sorry, this makes no sense to me. I run stable
> >> for the most part and having a package that portage depends on that is
> >> not stable just sounds a little like putting the cart before the horse.
> >>
> >> See some of the other replies as to why this is a not so good idea.
> >>
> >> Dale
> >>
> >> :-) :-)
> >
> > You mix it up. Portage works with python 3.1. If an user switches to
> > python
> > 3.1 as the main interpreter, it's possible that his own scripts won't
> > work.
>
> Yes?
>
> # eselect python set 2
> # emerge -s foo
> File "/usr/bin/emerge", line 41
> except PermissionDenied, e:
> ^
> SyntaxError: invalid syntax
>
>
> Ummm, yes, it works *beautifully*, you see. Nothing else to add.
I have fixed it today :) .
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/portage?rev=14289&view=rev
> > Marking it stable sometine in november give's some time to ebuilds
> > maintainers to fix their python based apps just like it's done with gcc
> > stabilization.
>
> That's not the usual case. In Gentoo we have a serious policy of not
> marking as stable things until it has passed one month without any serious
> bug report about it.
There wasn't any serious bug report about Python 3.1.
IIRC the only problem was a (already fixed) build failure caused by non-UTF-8
characters in header of Berkeley DB.
Stabilization of Python 3.1.1-r1 is planned over 1 month after its addition to
the tree and about 3 months after addition of 3.1 slot to the tree.
--
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-20 15:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-19 16:48 [gentoo-dev] Stabilization of Python 3.1 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2009-09-19 16:53 ` Dirkjan Ochtman
2009-09-19 17:06 ` Alex Legler
2009-09-19 17:09 ` Dirkjan Ochtman
2009-09-19 17:21 ` Dale
2009-09-19 17:28 ` Olivier Crête
2009-09-19 22:32 ` Dale
2009-09-19 22:41 ` Dawid Węgliński
2009-09-20 14:53 ` Jesús Guerrero
2009-09-20 15:16 ` Dale
2009-09-20 15:24 ` Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis [this message]
2009-09-20 15:28 ` Jesús Guerrero
2009-09-20 17:30 ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2009-09-20 17:57 ` Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2009-09-20 22:15 ` Mark Loeser
2009-09-20 22:47 ` Dale
2009-09-20 11:18 ` Richard Freeman
2009-09-20 14:51 ` Dale
2009-09-19 17:33 ` [gentoo-dev] " Nikos Chantziaras
2009-09-19 17:26 ` [gentoo-dev] " Alex Legler
2009-09-19 18:24 ` AllenJB
2009-09-19 18:20 ` AllenJB
2009-09-19 18:59 ` Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2009-09-19 19:50 ` Petteri Räty
2009-09-19 20:21 ` Robert Bridge
2009-09-19 23:29 ` Alex Alexander
2009-09-20 10:35 ` Petteri Räty
2009-09-20 20:33 ` Zac Medico
2009-09-19 22:52 ` [gentoo-dev] " Mark Bateman
2009-09-20 14:44 ` [gentoo-dev] " Jesús Guerrero
2009-09-20 15:46 ` Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2009-09-20 15:56 ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2009-09-20 16:07 ` Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2009-09-20 17:25 ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2009-09-20 17:35 ` Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2009-09-20 17:47 ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2009-09-20 18:27 ` Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2009-09-20 18:46 ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2009-09-20 19:05 ` Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2009-10-08 20:56 ` Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2009-09-20 16:51 ` Robert Buchholz
2009-09-20 17:25 ` Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2009-09-20 22:20 ` Mark Loeser
2009-09-21 1:17 ` Brian Harring
2009-09-21 6:18 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2009-09-20 17:10 ` [gentoo-dev] " Petteri Räty
2009-09-19 18:22 ` Tobias Klausmann
2009-09-19 18:51 ` Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2009-09-20 14:44 ` Jesús Guerrero
2009-09-19 18:45 ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2009-09-19 18:53 ` Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2009-09-19 19:40 ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2009-09-19 19:35 ` Mark Loeser
2009-09-19 20:47 ` [gentoo-dev] " Ryan Hill
2009-09-19 20:55 ` [gentoo-dev] " Alistair Bush
2009-09-19 23:31 ` [gentoo-dev] " Ryan Hill
2009-09-19 23:45 ` Francesco R
2009-09-20 0:42 ` Alistair Bush
2009-09-20 14:46 ` Francesco R
2009-09-20 14:49 ` [gentoo-dev] " Jesús Guerrero
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200909201725.00070.Arfrever@gentoo.org \
--to=arfrever@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox