From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MjvrZ-0003HS-Rh for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 05 Sep 2009 14:03:33 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6E7B0E0866; Sat, 5 Sep 2009 14:03:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp240.poczta.interia.pl (smtp240.poczta.interia.pl [217.74.64.240]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4009CE0866 for ; Sat, 5 Sep 2009 14:03:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp240.poczta.interia.pl (INTERIA.PL, from userid 502) id 6037E26FD7F; Sat, 5 Sep 2009 16:03:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from poczta.interia.pl (mi06.poczta.interia.pl [10.217.12.6]) by smtp240.poczta.interia.pl (INTERIA.PL) with ESMTP id 0500526FD97 for ; Sat, 5 Sep 2009 16:03:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: by poczta.interia.pl (INTERIA.PL, from userid 502) id BB4F61324D1; Sat, 5 Sep 2009 16:03:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lebrodyl.localnet (ani1.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl [83.26.90.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by www.poczta.fm (INTERIA.PL) with ESMTP id D8A801324C3 for ; Sat, 5 Sep 2009 16:03:30 +0200 (CEST) From: Maciej Mrozowski To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Add operator + for licenses (EAPI-4 ?) Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 16:03:25 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.1 (Linux/2.6.30-gentoo-r4; KDE/4.3.1; x86_64; ; ) References: <4A9C4AD6.9080505@gentoo.org> <4AA172DE.80104@gentoo.org> <20090904210802.0d4b1cad@snowcone> In-Reply-To: <20090904210802.0d4b1cad@snowcone> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1366568.o8jUnOG0gG"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200909051603.25429.reavertm@poczta.fm> X-EMID: 54377138 X-Archives-Salt: 1de4c79f-ef8f-4ee8-8d2e-7fa2773f813b X-Archives-Hash: 424aa1eb1c9cee4e62929475b2d0b121 --nextPart1366568.o8jUnOG0gG Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Friday 04 of September 2009 22:08:02 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Fri, 04 Sep 2009 22:04:46 +0200 > R=E9mi Cardona wrote: > > Having tools to manipulate those variables is very misleading since > > users will (rightfully) assume that we've done our homework and that > > upstream did too. > Why not use EAPI 4 to make sure people have done that homework then? Because it won't make *upstream* do their homework. I suppose you volunteer to make this homework for Gentoo to fulfill new EAP= I=20 requirements as I assume your lawyer skills equals the will to propose yet= =20 another EAPI. Therefore I fully support this idea. =2D-=20 regards MM --nextPart1366568.o8jUnOG0gG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkqib60ACgkQFuHa/bHpVdsdngCgsHvbsik60nHlyhAi3kgcz2hE kh4AoJ9mEf9MleglsQt4uizvGbagCWXx =h4C+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1366568.o8jUnOG0gG--