From: Maciej Mrozowski <reavertm@poczta.fm>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Add operator + for licenses (EAPI-4 ?)
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 16:03:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200909051603.25429.reavertm@poczta.fm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090904210802.0d4b1cad@snowcone>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 673 bytes --]
On Friday 04 of September 2009 22:08:02 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Sep 2009 22:04:46 +0200
> Rémi Cardona <remi@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > Having tools to manipulate those variables is very misleading since
> > users will (rightfully) assume that we've done our homework and that
> > upstream did too.
> Why not use EAPI 4 to make sure people have done that homework then?
Because it won't make *upstream* do their homework.
I suppose you volunteer to make this homework for Gentoo to fulfill new EAPI
requirements as I assume your lawyer skills equals the will to propose yet
another EAPI.
Therefore I fully support this idea.
--
regards
MM
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-05 14:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-31 22:12 [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Add operator + for licenses (EAPI-4 ?) Mounir Lamouri
2009-08-31 22:30 ` Rémi Cardona
2009-09-03 20:50 ` Mounir Lamouri
2009-09-01 2:21 ` Sebastian Pipping
2009-09-01 5:54 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2009-09-03 21:10 ` Mounir Lamouri
2009-09-03 21:15 ` Rémi Cardona
2009-09-03 21:27 ` Mounir Lamouri
2009-09-04 4:53 ` Duncan
2009-09-04 15:01 ` Rémi Cardona
2009-09-04 18:52 ` David Leverton
2009-09-04 20:04 ` Rémi Cardona
2009-09-04 20:08 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2009-09-05 14:03 ` Maciej Mrozowski [this message]
2009-09-05 15:02 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2009-09-06 0:34 ` Thomas Anderson
2009-09-06 6:31 ` Rémi Cardona
2009-09-03 21:08 ` [gentoo-dev] " Mounir Lamouri
2009-09-04 21:11 ` Sebastian Pipping
2009-09-05 1:06 ` Zac Medico
2009-09-05 8:40 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2009-09-05 9:28 ` [gentoo-dev] " Ulrich Mueller
2009-09-05 10:59 ` Zac Medico
2009-09-05 17:21 ` Mounir Lamouri
2009-09-05 18:41 ` Ulrich Mueller
2009-09-06 0:14 ` Sebastian Pipping
2009-09-05 21:37 ` Zac Medico
2009-10-01 2:01 ` Sebastian Pipping
2009-10-01 13:09 ` volkmar
2009-09-04 15:47 ` Jeremy Olexa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200909051603.25429.reavertm@poczta.fm \
--to=reavertm@poczta.fm \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox