From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mfe0e-0000jz-Eg for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 24 Aug 2009 18:11:13 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AF4BBE0102; Mon, 24 Aug 2009 18:11:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mo-p05-ob.rzone.de (mo-p05-ob.rzone.de [81.169.146.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5675FE0102 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2009 18:11:10 +0000 (UTC) X-RZG-AUTH: :K2kKYU+nW/MMMlTokcN5Yot1/Bj/FTl+WviP6RIJci0HRMpbh/x+X6ShOQvVOjw+sRFSc0IAJ7w= X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo05 Received: from localhost (p57A4FE32.dip.t-dialin.net [87.164.254.50]) by post.strato.de (fruni mo47) (RZmta 21.0) with ESMTP id K07018l7OHhHF9 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2009 20:11:09 +0200 (MEST) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 20:11:11 +0200 From: Christian Faulhammer To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Two-level portage tree is irrelevant. Message-ID: <20090824201111.4f7bd102@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4A92B970.5050107@mail.ru> References: <4A92B970.5050107@mail.ru> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.2 (GTK+ 2.14.7; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/Na8MopFBSgM1KI5EC=+J+Im"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 91fec5be-7958-4346-8f3b-02b92d2b3ab7 X-Archives-Hash: 8bb8105dc42ce47b930f2bb0b6913c6a --Sig_/Na8MopFBSgM1KI5EC=+J+Im Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Dmitry Grigoriev : > Jeremy Olexa already answered me in bugzilla that this is not new > idea, but I'll submit my suggestion here anyway as a "voice of > crowd". :) I'm just home user with about 2 years linux experience, do > like gentoo, but with exception of this inconvenience. People already suggested tagging which embraces your proposal and is more flexible. The problem is: Somehow has to do that. V-Li --=20 Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project , #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode --Sig_/Na8MopFBSgM1KI5EC=+J+Im Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkqS178ACgkQNQqtfCuFneMo6ACcDjc+cyNbDtvGFlh3Q4OQhnbO Ye8An1NbNAj3USY6GbTbHJCKB4MbZobT =6/dx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/Na8MopFBSgM1KI5EC=+J+Im--