From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MfeoD-0001H0-G0 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 24 Aug 2009 19:02:25 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0CB55E030E; Mon, 24 Aug 2009 19:02:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pz0-f187.google.com (mail-pz0-f187.google.com [209.85.222.187]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3792E030E for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2009 19:02:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pzk17 with SMTP id 17so998379pzk.32 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:02:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:received:date:from:to :subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=4GQSsPJFPDCz/NEEYXXZE7rXLQ4DYVjPAkjODH7Mts0=; b=jr6jSc7IknmiExC3VhEvakkg2aTJbub9gH4YkuQi+3cmACcrr7QChORuNDzSGMGGQH 5WgxnvSwUXgvDQPi5YO7dHo23e5B8Fbf4VEcEATmm2dvu7wlWENQjM9pEV8Dk1nPDesC 6V+0LPhZeU5VeAeItAsDVVaj05vJ/fD2PD2/0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=GlIg8CgRAAPKoLb/QZrTXn8bfqEOrRJz+XF4KLKQWGaTrKJllnZKpA37rcazEd7krh h5S4p9lw18VNdm4oTi/118b4jTPsniktQCcep1Ph3kaL9JHHzyQJh2LQhuPfMqBsPCYe 5wwPubJNcHt4Q8ZqxGTlX/ZiG+4E5NGpr1vMs= Received: by 10.115.39.8 with SMTP id r8mr6431264waj.104.1251140543324; Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:02:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.gmail.com (c-68-46-138-24.hsd1.nj.comcast.net [68.46.138.24]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c26sm497021waa.50.2009.08.24.12.02.21 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:02:22 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Thomas Anderson Received: by smtp.gmail.com (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1000 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) gentoofan23@gentoo.org; Mon, 24 Aug 2009 15:02:22 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 15:02:19 -0400 From: Thomas Anderson To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: EAPI 3 and "nonfatal die" Message-ID: <20090824190219.GA5593@dodo.hsd1.nj.comcast.net> References: <200908212156.42396.levertond@googlemail.com> <20090821204619.2fd2bda5@gentoo.org> <20090824202044.17f7118c@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090824202044.17f7118c@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) X-Archives-Salt: 9ed1f56e-8652-49ff-8105-2e38e48cb8af X-Archives-Hash: 393083a73b38d84870da3ca6cde04acf --k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 08:20:44PM +0200, Christian Faulhammer wrote: > Hi, >=20 > Ryan Hill : >=20 > > On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 21:56:41 +0100 > > David Leverton wrote: > >=20 > > > Does anyone have any opinions on which of the four options (#1 > > > make die respect nonfatal, #2 make die always die, #3 add a new > > > die variant that respects nonfatal, #4 make regular die respect > > > nonfatal, and add a new variant that doesn't) we should go with? > > > We should definitely get this resolved and agreed on before EAPI > > > 3 is finalised. > >=20 > > I'd like die to respect nonfatal. People using nonfatal should check > > beforehand that the functions they're calling won't do anything > > stupid if die's are ignored. If there's something that absolutely > > has to die, nonfatal or not, then use a variable. I guess that's #4? >=20 > I agree here (yes, I know, a "ME TOO" posting, but I say this as PMS > team member). I must agree here too as a PMS team member. so 'me too' :P --=20 --------- Thomas Anderson Gentoo Developer ///////// Areas of responsibility: AMD64, Secretary to the Gentoo Council --------- --k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkqS47sACgkQF6yMcaBxwHmZGwCeILj0OMDahZ35b9Vn0ME+xewU THQAmQH9k9nWi4Tyrtx3vic1XPBj88+C =dkND -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G--