From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mf1hA-0001U8-88 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 23 Aug 2009 01:16:32 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C44BAE0396; Sun, 23 Aug 2009 01:16:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ew0-f218.google.com (mail-ew0-f218.google.com [209.85.219.218]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88840E0396 for ; Sun, 23 Aug 2009 01:16:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy18 with SMTP id 18so1725754ewy.14 for ; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 18:16:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type; bh=FYezG9kzgrB/oJH6KVtFOljIO47SMj18KRz0uSYt5zo=; b=MFVAk4cwnAaurdKB/BiGH9cMM+oEPDlE+Aq69nAqEKJNKxUZe1KE52WZfkNmLUkTkS hiCxQdEI8Nsz4XoeRoWu+8/+87l0q1+TkM+jWo61RHq7k4hSl3MlF7EfYy2MwITzXkfN 9RNEUHSiYFsONdJc0Sj67zWeSkrFQC8bgLzCA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=Wp7yHOrOAV013FEPw7+v/AhDdABcKGKLroISdHLhzhsOw658td7R0XvGGIMsvXCSCB i9pPnMAUGjSLm3vCspLhZGC89vbsjIibUI3xAEuCl5qmSktBeBA/ViR00zfHTRm9A3hk Tb7jIBX12DRJymB1lFlnA+QcLsneaN7givfqQ= Received: by 10.210.91.13 with SMTP id o13mr2184750ebb.24.1250990189994; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 18:16:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from snowmobile (92-235-187-79.cable.ubr18.sgyl.blueyonder.co.uk [92.235.187.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 10sm6829663eyd.34.2009.08.22.18.16.29 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 22 Aug 2009 18:16:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 02:16:24 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Make 10.0 profiles EAPI-2 'compliant' Message-ID: <20090823021624.1b611db4@snowmobile> In-Reply-To: <9f2790160908221810k493ee3ebo12328b537e1d1135@mail.gmail.com> References: <90b936c0908121058y5fd25cfcm67a19761b1130896@mail.gmail.com> <20090822225237.5b67b6e3@snowcone> <9f2790160908221726j627de694m6d20ae6303dfae14@mail.gmail.com> <200908230132.20855.levertond@googlemail.com> <9f2790160908221810k493ee3ebo12328b537e1d1135@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.2 (GTK+ 2.16.5; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/ykAcrQahp97v.m0bk3Y50M1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 3462fa71-a9cf-4d4d-a387-780d50638a45 X-Archives-Hash: b010cf44097456e7747115ced174a12d --Sig_/ykAcrQahp97v.m0bk3Y50M1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 18:10:36 -0700 Chip Parker wrote: > What you proposed in the bug you filed would specifically break how I > do things, without replacing it with an equal or better solution. No it wouldn't. It would have no effect whatsoever on how you do things. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/ykAcrQahp97v.m0bk3Y50M1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkqQmGoACgkQ96zL6DUtXhH1xwCgzFdlW5w2wM/Y2q/9/wiTgpuk 2tQAoKpzXB/hNrLqRVeCgYa+Or48lXn5 =4OTk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/ykAcrQahp97v.m0bk3Y50M1--