From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mex9S-00012U-Cz for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 20:25:26 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4F7F4E023E; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 20:25:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ew0-f218.google.com (mail-ew0-f218.google.com [209.85.219.218]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14931E023E for ; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 20:25:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy18 with SMTP id 18so1627992ewy.14 for ; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 13:25:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type; bh=1now8PVknBLt+KPy1bZUM49FQWQbMzteiRE6sUyewbQ=; b=q4hIPn3d3w+giS0HWB45qXX3x5W24Glz/h0IVaU/6d5DgqNIe2JgQ657cXkd8XAN24 YBrrAUfr8bg3Q9MgNnI8D+zAK3RL8GWmadekVEm4A4O7Nh9Dw1iB18xuY/YRflDNduSp 3Y7+uvv9zostxrpcP7adtHEB0foUazqW7ekgI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=kATbCC4A0tBrtNI0mFD5uk/e3w9rMtwqIqRsd91rXk4NCixJA8MER9/0jkRNByuxME 3HvY0lHDcl/C7DHE3Luxw/xiMgMCSyMYOTVp6E2Qo/QzNtDhFJMrWImC8hcRZDd+9i9y bRf28lBRHNSMTjLp9PwtTR9CDPYD+MPU02+xI= Received: by 10.210.88.4 with SMTP id l4mr2787491ebb.92.1250972724538; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 13:25:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from snowcone (92-235-187-79.cable.ubr18.sgyl.blueyonder.co.uk [92.235.187.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 10sm3487392eyz.51.2009.08.22.13.25.23 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 22 Aug 2009 13:25:24 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 21:25:18 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Make 10.0 profiles EAPI-2 'compliant' Message-ID: <20090822212518.16c27ee3@snowcone> In-Reply-To: <200908222222.59190.Arfrever@gentoo.org> References: <90b936c0908121058y5fd25cfcm67a19761b1130896@mail.gmail.com> <4A8F41BE.4090509@allenjb.me.uk> <20090822203947.7bee89ef@snowcone> <200908222222.59190.Arfrever@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.2 (GTK+ 2.16.5; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/P.GwPMxbel.UCd431fB03IH"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 8b232ec2-9be8-4f5f-b18e-d349de747cad X-Archives-Hash: 1825bc05f7d268f46a7c10d603768721 --Sig_/P.GwPMxbel.UCd431fB03IH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 22:22:54 +0200 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > > Another possibly nicer option would be to add the feature into EAPI > > 3. However, if we're considering this, we'd have to be absolutely > > totally clear that this isn't a call to open up EAPI 3 for yet more > > changes. >=20 > EAPI=3D3 can be opened also for other changes trivial to implement > (e.g. allowing bash-4.0 features). That isn't a trivial implementation feature unless GLEP 55 is passed, since it breaks sourcing for metadata for users of older Portage versions. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/P.GwPMxbel.UCd431fB03IH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkqQVDEACgkQ96zL6DUtXhFPsgCeN+QvtBsg/DtZl2KnOEIU1GZe 8tgAoIXD8YiCyaKvJYqxTjYLp/G6LuDf =50oz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/P.GwPMxbel.UCd431fB03IH--