From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MeeZX-0007zd-L8 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 00:35:07 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0BCA2E05CB; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 00:35:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ew0-f218.google.com (mail-ew0-f218.google.com [209.85.219.218]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C57F1E05CB for ; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 00:35:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy18 with SMTP id 18so1180022ewy.14 for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 17:35:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type; bh=xs++UFBnyhTe2yhL6Llefv1HVg7ZENE9AtP56v++ZjQ=; b=baBwAwsjYxAghICMWW1HNJl6JaSxoExGP811beFj2noc/65OKbkjvATKfwFSssVipX XSbDDjWtp1ijFGsDfEGxbmoEDeneZfjfCe77DraFFOfagXz0zzVOiPJ18XZ1XYkktAwk QNjX1sgN47UYIrWIkesXeVbHeNfRzDZA2/pYk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=Vm4ymdin3fFqTZzbXkAzM5gF18SjkCEOoA0vDcw/dCvMhwCkT1Jg+N8Pi35o6WaQ1l Nn503wRBDWuqnk7AjznLb7DgxhM8pRw5mSElDkXaIpDrinj6h+L1GiaYDkcnb/dNOLSg 3Rif/nzB+cDBShSdJBBx7DETkoVDKfSbnzFlI= Received: by 10.210.131.5 with SMTP id e5mr1504929ebd.45.1250901305262; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 17:35:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from snowmobile (92-235-187-79.cable.ubr18.sgyl.blueyonder.co.uk [92.235.187.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 10sm1739964eyd.14.2009.08.21.17.35.04 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 21 Aug 2009 17:35:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 01:34:59 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Make 10.0 profiles EAPI-2 'compliant' Message-ID: <20090822013459.1ace9a4b@snowmobile> In-Reply-To: <9f2790160908211729w79e1a838i8daf2e3df096c6bb@mail.gmail.com> References: <90b936c0908121058y5fd25cfcm67a19761b1130896@mail.gmail.com> <20090821224638.1f797d4b@snowmobile> <200908220110.33794.reavertm@poczta.fm> <200908220145.00956.rbu@gentoo.org> <9f2790160908211729w79e1a838i8daf2e3df096c6bb@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.2 (GTK+ 2.16.5; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/FlzhhPfLXfdC5VWknKj6iMf"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 8e974b5e-6838-4a90-b125-a7dc435056d6 X-Archives-Hash: 1fdcdde84b45bf51c256424b025de1d4 --Sig_/FlzhhPfLXfdC5VWknKj6iMf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 17:29:12 -0700 Chip Parker wrote: > If this feature, which HAD been documented (in bugzilla and > commitlogs) prior to the first RFC for PMS As I've already explained to you on bugzilla, this is untrue. You're confusing user configuration with the tree. PMS has nothing to say about user configuration, and nothing is being done to take away the feature you're concerned about. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/FlzhhPfLXfdC5VWknKj6iMf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkqPPTYACgkQ96zL6DUtXhEmSACgv5x/499yMPn3wFd8pIPewdo2 DJIAoN9j4LqWFS0WYTNrOYyu4vmbuiyd =CbdZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/FlzhhPfLXfdC5VWknKj6iMf--