From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MedIb-0007Wq-KV for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 23:13:33 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 80F11E063C; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 23:13:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62C45E063C for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 23:13:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from afta-gentoo.localnet (ip-85-198-235-97.broker.com.pl [85.198.235.97]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D65086423D for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 23:13:34 +0000 (UTC) From: Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis To: Gentoo Development Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI 3 and "nonfatal die" Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 01:15:18 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.0 (Linux/2.6.30-tuxonice-r5-AFTA; KDE/4.3.0; x86_64; ; ) References: <200908212156.42396.levertond@googlemail.com> <200908220040.09555.Arfrever@gentoo.org> <20090821235114.274a6c7b@snowmobile> In-Reply-To: <20090821235114.274a6c7b@snowmobile> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1814182.pU8ZuyBEcO"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200908220115.22779.Arfrever@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 5509f870-8825-423f-9f83-6d1b95fc1fb8 X-Archives-Hash: 277227f12f226e0173da1a3f20dec598 --nextPart1814182.pU8ZuyBEcO Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2009-08-22 00:51:14 Ciaran McCreesh napisa=C5=82(a): > On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 00:40:04 +0200 > Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > > I would like to also notice that (not yet approved by Council) > > definition of nonfatal() in PMS was recently drastically changed > > without proper discussion with developers of other package managers. > > [1] was sent about 20 minutes after discussion about nonfatal() > > started in #gentoo-portage in about 2009-08-06 19:45 UTC. (I'm > > attaching IRC log from #gentoo-portage (in UTC+02 timezone).) I think > > that such drastic changes should be first discussed on gentoo-dev > > mailing list. >=20 > There was no change to the definition of nonfatal. =20 There was a change regardless of what you think. > There was a clarification of the wording after it became clear that there > was room to misinterpret the intent of the original wording, and it went > through the usual Council-mandated process for such a change. This sentence contradicts your first sentence. Additionally you had deceived Christian Faulhammer by not presenting negative consequences of your patch = and your interpretation of original wording of definition of nonfatal(). =2D-=20 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis --nextPart1814182.pU8ZuyBEcO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkqPKooACgkQIEGVSeBq/j4PrwCfbVnzYKsSSOfb5nXbP+Q5rPsA DJ8AnApWEbvHsy8+b8DLap2+bYErEVvy =XCTX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1814182.pU8ZuyBEcO--