From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MedC0-00062R-HR for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 23:06:45 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 61D99E02C0; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 23:06:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ew0-f218.google.com (mail-ew0-f218.google.com [209.85.219.218]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22E9CE02C0 for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 23:06:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy18 with SMTP id 18so1141658ewy.14 for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 16:06:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type; bh=LIulTQu0SCXVHh2aurN7e0sCo4tZkCxIvyccvIQxsHQ=; b=t1M2O+VCaxPcEStIrjthWO5kWcHlfzrP/SMQcRDNpH7gRM68ToBXQpscQrC+I5HKND myW2nrBqRxHT3yOq2W8r7OxUK+943Fj84RD+EL22WmpqJH2xL4nCAihWfJxiu0U52XkO gxpBWgK9NlNouy7SHrKGMGbkVOxtAXtPX9BiM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=FfVVvr/6yD0Yv7nYz4+j4sGWrlZua+8tYNXFZN4Dm43j+G+3o8QpOixAje0G2EWCx8 wltTBXUW8ZsMd0z2519DgUJKv319eWlqKXsMPv593cdTLetm3WNFQzzS6LV+SPxeuAy/ W3mR9X0OSobS5kcqzD8rfrO6eccf1IvpQKAZk= Received: by 10.211.199.13 with SMTP id b13mr1810578ebq.57.1250896002615; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 16:06:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from snowmobile (92-235-187-79.cable.ubr18.sgyl.blueyonder.co.uk [92.235.187.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 10sm628256eyz.31.2009.08.21.16.06.42 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 21 Aug 2009 16:06:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 00:06:30 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI 3 and "nonfatal die" Message-ID: <20090822000630.76a2e9cb@snowmobile> In-Reply-To: <200908220101.49154.reavertm@poczta.fm> References: <200908212156.42396.levertond@googlemail.com> <200908212309.34324.reavertm@poczta.fm> <20090821221223.2e37a816@snowcone> <200908220101.49154.reavertm@poczta.fm> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.2 (GTK+ 2.16.5; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/eK1yO7NVUJI9kqp.DdvH.ms"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 3e00f8b9-b71f-4ce7-a507-da7985ceffca X-Archives-Hash: c2000921905e399cea463e23e9cb203f --Sig_/eK1yO7NVUJI9kqp.DdvH.ms Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 01:01:48 +0200 Maciej Mrozowski wrote: > That being said I don't like refraining from "return value approach" > towards "exception handling approach" nonfatal's not an exception handling approach. Think of it as a utility like 'nice', 'ionice', 'xargs', 'env' or 'hilite'. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/eK1yO7NVUJI9kqp.DdvH.ms Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkqPKHwACgkQ96zL6DUtXhH0LwCgqqo/9AJ+KHEbo5S8ihQZvWqH Nh4Ani7CTwhQoU1BP14B4O5LWBFNtEAt =6sxr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/eK1yO7NVUJI9kqp.DdvH.ms--