Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Make 10.0 profiles EAPI-2 'compliant'

[Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <Arfrever@gentoo.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 1158 bytes --]

2009-08-21 23:17:56 Ryan Hill napisał(a):
> On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 16:25:35 +0200
> Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <Arfrever@gentoo.org> wrote:
> 
> > 2009-08-13 07:55:22 Ryan Hill napisał(a):
> > > On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 19:46:56 +0100
> > > Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 20:41:30 +0200
> > > > Tomáš Chvátal <scarabeus@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > > > > Also we should allow the stuff as directory thingus (portage already
> > > > > handles it right).
> > > > 
> > > > That's a seperate thing that needs EAPI control. You'll need to propose
> > > > it for EAPI 4 if you want that.
> > > 
> > > Why is that (seriously curious, not disagreeing)?  Portage has supported this
> > > for quite a while now.  Does the current PMS disallow it?
> > 
> > Portage documentation has been properly fixed (and the fix will be released
> > in next version) and this feature can now be used in 10.0 profiles.
> 
> How does changing the portage documentation magically add this to the PMS?

PMS developers are unwilling to fix many bugs in PMS.

-- 
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]