From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MeV1u-0000Hu-Ii for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:23:46 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E3ADEE04C2; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:23:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0CE4E04C2 for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:23:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from afta-gentoo.localnet (ip-85-198-235-97.broker.com.pl [85.198.235.97]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03A6A66F36 for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:23:46 +0000 (UTC) From: Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis To: Gentoo Development Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Make 10.0 profiles EAPI-2 'compliant' Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 16:25:35 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.0 (Linux/2.6.30-tuxonice-r5-AFTA; KDE/4.3.0; x86_64; ; ) References: <90b936c0908121058y5fd25cfcm67a19761b1130896@mail.gmail.com> <20090812194656.47300704@snowcone> <20090812235522.19133a51@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20090812235522.19133a51@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1366510.0KBI6vDbfa"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200908211625.42832.Arfrever@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: b124ee10-6914-46ee-b5bb-490cf34d578a X-Archives-Hash: 17ba3887f10f4d09b49fe460ca152935 --nextPart1366510.0KBI6vDbfa Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2009-08-13 07:55:22 Ryan Hill napisa=C5=82(a): > On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 19:46:56 +0100 > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >=20 > > On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 20:41:30 +0200 > > Tom=C3=A1=C5=A1 Chv=C3=A1tal wrote: > > > Also we should allow the stuff as directory thingus (portage already > > > handles it right). > >=20 > > That's a seperate thing that needs EAPI control. You'll need to propose > > it for EAPI 4 if you want that. >=20 > Why is that (seriously curious, not disagreeing)? Portage has supported = this > for quite a while now. Does the current PMS disallow it? Portage documentation has been properly fixed (and the fix will be released in next version) and this feature can now be used in 10.0 profiles. =2D-=20 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis --nextPart1366510.0KBI6vDbfa Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkqOrmYACgkQIEGVSeBq/j61jwCeKdJgrGwyHvi//GYASGvZRn0A 3dIAniffZOn8Y2Zu7l4CIV0H5XHWLkDj =OcX4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1366510.0KBI6vDbfa--