From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MbIvU-0001tg-D7 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2009 18:51:56 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7AA9EE034F; Wed, 12 Aug 2009 18:51:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 524C5E034F for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2009 18:51:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from afta-gentoo.localnet (ip-85-198-235-97.broker.com.pl [85.198.235.97]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7741668AD for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2009 18:51:53 +0000 (UTC) From: Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis To: Gentoo Development Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Make 10.0 profiles EAPI-2 'compliant' Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 20:53:55 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.0 (Linux/2.6.30-tuxonice-r4-AFTA; KDE/4.3.0; x86_64; ; ) References: <90b936c0908121058y5fd25cfcm67a19761b1130896@mail.gmail.com> <200908122041.34205.scarabeus@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200908122041.34205.scarabeus@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2090757.eT0A89efaP"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200908122054.01853.Arfrever@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 9626ac0e-5296-4d8f-b02f-f11cdbc1377f X-Archives-Hash: 7eab1ebd2e55113cfe397adb6d586ea2 --nextPart2090757.eT0A89efaP Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2009-08-12 20:41:30 Tom=C3=A1=C5=A1 Chv=C3=A1tal napisa=C5=82(a): > Dne st=C5=99eda 12 Srpen 2009 19:58:05 Jeremy Olexa napsal(a): > > I am suggesting that the new 10.0 profiles be marked as EAPI-2 > > compliant. This involves setting the content of the 'eapi' file to "2" > > and bumping up the required portage version. > > > > This seems like progress to me. Often, developers are complaining that > > they can't use SLOT syntax in profiles (I know that is EAPI-1). Since, > > the only time we can bump EAPI syntax in profiles is upon a new > > directory creation, this seems like a good time to me. The new > > profiles are still in flux until the official stages/cd's are > > produced. > > > > Also, another good reason is: "why not?" I don't think any Gentoo user > > can avoid EAPI-2 up til now anyway. > > > > Any comments? No comments means it will be decided off-list. > > Timeframe: 1 week from now. > > -Jeremy > Agreed. This is great idea. > Also we should allow the stuff as directory thingus (portage already hand= les=20 > it right). > package.mask/koffice-2 > package.mask/live-gnome > .... +1. =2D-=20 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis --nextPart2090757.eT0A89efaP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkqDD8kACgkQIEGVSeBq/j7k+wCfWObEnl2u5luFz8XUiEZepRcd CWMAn1Mte1qw8BgSY+jeazEGj8N/SoSU =9bOa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2090757.eT0A89efaP--