From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MbImj-0000BI-Ss for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2009 18:42:54 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3EA7EE0507; Wed, 12 Aug 2009 18:42:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F140E0507 for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2009 18:42:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from arcarius.localnet (smer.tone.cz [89.250.247.23]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E189668AD for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2009 18:42:31 +0000 (UTC) From: =?utf-8?q?Tom=C3=A1=C5=A1_Chv=C3=A1tal?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Make 10.0 profiles EAPI-2 'compliant' Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 20:41:30 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.0 (Linux/2.6.29-gentoo; KDE/4.2.95; x86_64; ; ) References: <90b936c0908121058y5fd25cfcm67a19761b1130896@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <90b936c0908121058y5fd25cfcm67a19761b1130896@mail.gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1813039.gBW3dOiSNO"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200908122041.34205.scarabeus@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 0f8b5b4c-0edd-4fbc-aa4e-1e75d3d3a156 X-Archives-Hash: e19f86eb0c537bb9aab0cefe13719d5a --nextPart1813039.gBW3dOiSNO Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dne st=C5=99eda 12 Srpen 2009 19:58:05 Jeremy Olexa napsal(a): > I am suggesting that the new 10.0 profiles be marked as EAPI-2 > compliant. This involves setting the content of the 'eapi' file to "2" > and bumping up the required portage version. > > This seems like progress to me. Often, developers are complaining that > they can't use SLOT syntax in profiles (I know that is EAPI-1). Since, > the only time we can bump EAPI syntax in profiles is upon a new > directory creation, this seems like a good time to me. The new > profiles are still in flux until the official stages/cd's are > produced. > > Also, another good reason is: "why not?" I don't think any Gentoo user > can avoid EAPI-2 up til now anyway. > > Any comments? No comments means it will be decided off-list. > Timeframe: 1 week from now. > -Jeremy Agreed. This is great idea. Also we should allow the stuff as directory thingus (portage already handle= s=20 it right). package.mask/koffice-2 package.mask/live-gnome =2E... Tomas --nextPart1813039.gBW3dOiSNO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkqDDN4ACgkQHB6c3gNBRYen7ACgom6R0rmbm6dwEeF0i7AKTBLa 20oAnRjbCGrIk5/jwrlxJYlgQokraEX1 =M/c4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1813039.gBW3dOiSNO--