From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MaqvH-00081X-MO for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:57:52 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BC43FE04B1; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:57:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.goodpoint.de (tori.goodpoint.de [85.10.203.41]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83E8AE04B1 for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:57:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: rbu) by mail.goodpoint.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A090A10A931; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 14:57:49 +0200 (CEST) From: Robert Buchholz To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Multimedia overlay Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 14:57:43 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 Cc: Maciej Mrozowski References: <4A809EFA.4070801@gentoo.org> <200908111108.38066.rbu@gentoo.org> <200908111240.35816.reavertm@poczta.fm> In-Reply-To: <200908111240.35816.reavertm@poczta.fm> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart69450425.0YVu1i2FvW"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200908111457.45249.rbu@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 9b82781f-109e-44f3-8101-fa5fe5e16ca8 X-Archives-Hash: 259fd393fc9816a76b9eeb7b4dc8f4cc --nextPart69450425.0YVu1i2FvW Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 11 August 2009, Maciej Mrozowski wrote: > On Tuesday 11 of August 2009 11:08:34 Robert Buchholz wrote: > > In my opinion, the entrance barrier for devs is lower on > > git.overlays, there is no signup, password, mail verification > > required. There's scripts to keep the ssh keys in LDAP and on > > git.overlays in sync, and people can just request access to at > > overlays@g.o and usually get it done within 24 hours. > > Except usually it takes much longer than 24 hours (like over a month > in my case). > No, thank you. Please do not generalise from your case. I do not have the history back=20 when your key was added, but the last mail dates I could correlate to=20 gitosis commits draw a different image: 2009-07-29: dev overlay creation, 80 minutes lag 2009-07-23: user key change, 27 minutes lag 2009-07-12: user added, 17 minutes lag 2009-06-09: user key change, 18:50 hours lag 2009-06-07: project overlay creation, 14:28 hours lag 2009-05-18: user key added, 14 minutes lag If you need something, mail overlays@g.o and if no one replies within=20 three days, mail again. And if you still encounter shortage of time,=20 sign up to be a dev and help out. Robert --nextPart69450425.0YVu1i2FvW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABCgAGBQJKgWrJAAoJECaaHo/OfoM5GFwP/2nW9TeZouL63y5bj0U8P1X2 7JpMlm3aw7QldlPYS9siicMkVjBjdGtPq+7HFMfo5J64BO08eVHBXYW2ldGNX6S7 WNZI5KUcgF4mqixB5bl2563LSQT3v2+Zb0Ao4iraUQdUz+HBVGoPhSYWVESW+0Pj bm+BB6nK5UXMJDsFwnWTPBEWyno4N4hP/n7QaqME0MkmoTyFbNc9UyIhlGlqmJGE TcwGOcU2+H6Qq4erAqOCVzpn7ejjl1SEpsjz1q6TUcP0yB6M76NxFO8pFouy/XoG NBYLRst45U0pAgfYFwtkY9VcjMXp5dRtvNC6qPM8+RBZUZmLeQ+kY4k/g1ZpmyUU ZoqcbJopPTDZk0hIeUjF9tZ4C0DtC705ChpTI7WZZEGtONAqE+Bzjg9HYzNWgzKc E8+mFtgNh/matoXZzQtLAKN0uj5yVb2y8e+NafE0OvP0t7dQEckAdKHLmTz0uYk3 2qvhs/ssfkH3jZRkxiKt+Nvh2aKhc09iBt1OQqj0jNcnn9dvvXjuVpmokMoMKnUx HOcxiiRXfIxKJyrsN8Lc1rU+i9OEdmZTLdITAGEb2ppH7sRr51lkaKUP9yzXGAWx p5RWQSREQP9KrXzCSHxeHWAPB9ruPzFkzoK98NhLkTDyyO6WZqHq1cQ7nPZiAyQy yfh+29Ncnsj6GDu5y4jQ =kphN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart69450425.0YVu1i2FvW--