From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MVAeT-0005I6-FA for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 20:49:01 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 55DCEE01A3; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 20:48:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 344D9E01A3 for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 20:48:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B80CC66434; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 20:48:58 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Adding a warning to description of global flag "profile". Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 16:48:56 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.4 (Linux/2.6.30; KDE/4.2.4; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Samuli Suominen References: <4A69791C.7010200@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4A69791C.7010200@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1670469.gS9VbxQbzk"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200907261648.57414.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 57318200-76c6-4570-851f-d12d311a195b X-Archives-Hash: b4f32a13a46cd7b970b4027b15cf82f2 --nextPart1670469.gS9VbxQbzk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 24 July 2009 05:04:28 Samuli Suominen wrote: > Would it be OK if I change > > [- ] profile - Adds support for software performance analysis (will > likely vary from ebuild to ebuild) > > To > > [- ] profile - Adds support for software performance analysis > (WARNING: DON'T ENABLE UNLESS YOU KNOW WHAT YOU ARE DOING.) the "WARNING:" is redundant > Or something similar? Suggestions welcome. People seem to add it > randomly in combination with -fomit-frame-pointer which breaks with -pg > as expected. seems a little harsh, but should be fine -mike --nextPart1670469.gS9VbxQbzk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJKbME5AAoJEEFjO5/oN/WB1SIQANe+gUqFvyedHa0nvm8iT5fM dyLIQrKYiRv1u8toD8wJxGNbMFkDfaWteWbiyIfoaGt8MnwZr/XCo5etNEpryFap TWYbUjZqpO748RJ+umbBla40i6y5qF9sY74PbBJxC+7mxZq3XmvA3lwpOQ1AqEBZ VLgyurG29Hkm7u44y/gtS+2R0wLUFRmLPB8K2DQbL6V4mAYDqUyxRTWRmI2xv/SZ 7ZkOsaRwPqzIi9IQgSAOly08JUEZUCMI4+7srcRgdxzcMkWjtoQEJfQ6l+z5nI4X 1VnS8gwiLJssP5mhdJvG5003FWpIppUy01t4wPsGfJoJHzGEjHRxuFomPJ4u7sg8 3ERI+VaEgm0T9Sw8CYnNFHapFA11CD/YU+Q1pjILNlxSWV3M2SOS0lsoeyhv/lzu /JOTguDSMCaY8dLHp9LEF9Q+ZdlDJ2Y4lVUb2+f8dUXFVBq80Cz3UMVKEzJebKCo fxmjssNeFrOOHCOs42OEaiokg/sFl1SIetH9HbxcvTkWfN0+PyBTCuf1DVu5JG8e k096CdkF++uT29qiQidcw+mEYvy40WRek0ziGP6xw85ZOSZhorMJ64ixWdusyG8P RbOM17poNo4Jy0I0NRvecnm63huSFKHXLX5R0pgcOIpSv30Mc6XEwyrSuMZ+JfpT IEV/Z0QR6GuG+5KcaL/J =dFnN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1670469.gS9VbxQbzk--