public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: A Little Council Reform Anyone?
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 00:03:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090708000341.26adbbe3@snowcone> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A53D159.4070601@gentoo.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, 07 Jul 2009 22:51:05 +0000
"Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" <jmbsvicetto@gentoo.org> wrote:
> As Denis has already stated we're not interested in the disputes
> between you, paludis, exherbo and some other users or projects
> (funtoo?). This ml is about Gentoo not about your (ciaranm, igli,
> trelane, etc) pet projects.

We were discussing the Gentoo PMS project, and the Council's
involvement therein.

> As you know very well, quite a few people would qualify your own
> behaviour at times like that. So this is one of those cases that you
> should start by looking at the mirror.
> 
> <snip>
> 
> We all have plenty examples of your bad behaviour, so let's not go
> down that route.

Please point to examples of where I've said that I want a project to
fail, or that I plan to oppose absolutely everything someone does
regardless of merit. Please also point to examples of where I've said
that I want anything other than what's best for Gentoo.

> Some people seem to think that the best way for Gentoo to progress as
> they would like, they need to ensure that you don't get to influence
> Gentoo as they consider your proposals compromise Gentoo's future.

Then they should address each proposal on its own merits. That isn't
what's being discussed, though. We're discussing a small group of
people whose stated aim is to disrupt anything they can associate with
me in any way. How is that in any way good for Gentoo's future?

> But again, we (Gentoo developers and community) are getting tired of
> all the "bile" flying around. Please stop with that.

Then please start by addressing the part of the email you snipped out,
and explain how you expect the Gentoo PMS project to operate under
those kinds of conditions, and why userrel hasn't stepped in when a
small group of users have said that they intend to sabotage a Gentoo
project.

- -- 
Ciaran McCreesh
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkpT1FEACgkQ96zL6DUtXhEzhgCgyMTbi6H5Rnm1HOWZKxAGiZuN
Ks0AoONu3hMcnL0eKJ/4xtvmxPT3DUvg
=xZ0Z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

  reply	other threads:[~2009-07-07 23:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-02  2:33 [gentoo-dev] A Little Council Reform Anyone? Ned Ludd
2009-07-02  3:41 ` Jeroen Roovers
2009-07-02  4:39 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-council] " Doug Goldstein
2009-07-02 13:49   ` Richard Freeman
2009-07-02  6:29 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2009-07-02 14:03 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-council] " Ferris McCormick
2009-07-02 14:54 ` Tobias Scherbaum
2009-07-02 14:57   ` Alec Warner
2009-07-02 15:00     ` Tobias Scherbaum
2009-07-03  5:32       ` Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
2009-07-03  6:16         ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2009-07-03  9:02         ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-council] " Luca Barbato
2009-07-03 10:09           ` Richard Freeman
2009-07-03 10:09             ` Richard Freeman
2009-07-02 16:27   ` Mike Frysinger
2009-07-03  5:51   ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2009-07-02 15:19 ` [gentoo-dev] " Rémi Cardona
2009-07-02 16:43 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-council] " Denis Dupeyron
2009-07-02 17:47 ` [gentoo-dev] " Michael Higgins
2009-07-02 18:32   ` Mike Frysinger
2009-07-02 20:14 ` [gentoo-dev] " Christian Faulhammer
2009-07-02 20:22   ` Ciaran McCreesh
2009-07-02 20:29     ` Christian Faulhammer
2009-07-02 20:43       ` Ciaran McCreesh
2009-07-03  9:08         ` Brian Harring
2009-07-03 12:19           ` Ciaran McCreesh
2009-07-07 12:49           ` [gentoo-dev] " Steven J Long
2009-07-07 13:45             ` Ciaran McCreesh
2009-07-07 16:09               ` Denis Dupeyron
2009-07-07 16:20                 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2009-07-07 16:34                   ` Rémi Cardona
2009-07-07 16:41                     ` Ciaran McCreesh
2009-07-07 18:11                     ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2009-07-07 17:55                   ` Denis Dupeyron
2009-07-07 21:51                     ` Ciaran McCreesh
2009-07-07 22:51                       ` Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
2009-07-07 23:03                         ` Ciaran McCreesh [this message]
2009-07-11 21:56                           ` [gentoo-dev] Guys: take it to -project Steven J Long
2009-07-10  2:50                       ` [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: A Little Council Reform Anyone? Andrew D Kirch
2009-07-10  3:40                         ` Alec Warner
2009-07-10 12:51                         ` Ferris McCormick
2009-07-15  1:48                           ` Donnie Berkholz
2009-07-02 21:13   ` [gentoo-dev] " Ned Ludd

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090708000341.26adbbe3@snowcone \
    --to=ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox